Francis Beaumont: Dramatist: A Portrait, with Some Account of His Circle, Elizabethan and Jacobean,; And of His Association with John Fletcher
John Stuart Mill · en
As mine own conscience too sensible;--
I must live scorned, or be a murderer;--
That trust out all our reputation.
Nor did Fletcher write, with any frequency, improper run-on lines, such
as III, 2, 135 (one of his collaborator's scenes):
Speak yet again, before mine anger grow
Up beyond throwing down.
In this play the percentage of run-on lines in Fletcher's scenes is
about nineteen; in the scenes not written by him, almost twenty-seven.
Fletcher's double endings are over forty per cent; his collaborator's
barely ten.
In _A King and No King_ similar Beaumontesque characteristics
distinguish the major portion of the play from the few scenes generally
acknowledged to be written by Fletcher. In Fletcher's scenes[155] one
notes the high proportion of stress-syllable openings, and,
consequently, of anapaestic substitutions, the subtle omission
occasionally of the arsis, and not infrequently of the thesis (or light
syllable) after the pause, and the use of the accented syllable at the
beginning of the verse-section. While sometimes these characteristics
appear in the other parts of the play, their relative infrequency is a
distinctive feature of the non-Fletcherian rhythm. A comparison of the
verse of Fletcher's Act IV, Scene 2, with that of his collaborator in
Act I, Scene 1, well illustrates this difference. The recurrence of the
feminine caesura measures fairly the relative elasticity of the
versifiers. It regulates two-thirds of Fletcher's lines; but of his
collaborator's not quite one half. Fletcher, for instance, wrote the
speech of Tigranes, beginning the second scene of Act IV:
[+!] Fool | that I am, | I have | undone | myself,
[+!] And | with mine own | hand | turn'd | my for|tune round,
That was | a fair | one: | I have child|ishly
[+!] Plaid | with my hope | so long, till I have broke | it,
And now too late I mourn for 't, | O | Spaco|nia,
Thou hast found | an e|ven way | to thy | revenge | now!
[+!] Why | didst thou fol|low me, |[+!] like | a faint shad|ow,
To wither my desires? But, wretched fool,
[+!] Why | did I plant | thee | 'twixt | the sun | and me,
To make | me freeze | thus? | Why | did I | prefer | her
[+!] To | the fair Prin|cess? | O | thou fool, | thou fool,
Thou family of fools, |[+!] live | like a slave | still
And in | thee bear | thine own |[+!] hell | and thy tor|ment,--
where, beside the frequent double endings and end-stopped lines, already
emphasized in preceding examples, we observe in the run of thirteen
lines, six stress-syllable openings with their anapaestic sequences,
three omissions of the light syllable after the caesural pause with the
consequent accent at the beginning of the verse-section, and no fewer
than six feminine caesurae (or pauses after an unaccented syllable) of
which three at least (vv. 2, 5, 10) are exaggerated jolts.