Loom and spindle : $b or life among the early mill girls with a sketch of "the Lowell offering" and some of its contributors
John Stuart Mill · en
Mr. Thomas, in response to a letter from her asking advice with regard
to the business affairs of the magazine, replies:--
“Make your terms cash. You will do well to keep constantly in
remembrance that your prosperity almost entirely depends on your
individual exertions. Puffing, advertising, scolding, will do little
or nothing. _Male_ agents will do little or nothing; but if you go as
females, with suitable brief papers signed by _eminent men_, to show
that you are not impostors, you will do well.... Be careful to guard
against the possibility of suspicion. This you can readily accomplish
by certificates from Saml. Lawrence, John Clark, and a few other
Lowellites, countersigned (if convenient) by the governor, Daniel
Webster, etc.”
In her valedictory at the close of Volume V., Miss Curtis announces
that she severs her connection with _The Offering_ for reasons
“entirely of a personal nature,” and as a parting benison adds:
“Friends, Patrons, and Foes (if we have any), may God bless you all
with every perfect gift!”
Although her connection with _The Offering_ was severed at this date,
Miss Curtis remained in Lowell until called away by the illness of
her mother. She continued her literary labors for a time, and was
a correspondent of several newspapers. Harriot was the friend and
correspondent of such men as John Neal, Horace Greeley, Nathaniel P.
Willis, and others well known in literary and public life.
She had a taste for politics and wrote intelligently on questions that
women were not supposed to understand. She contributed to the _New
York Tribune_ articles so clear and so caustic, that readers who did
not share the common delusion that “H. G.” wrote everything in Horace
Greeley’s paper, thought they must have been written by a _man_!
She was the friend and correspondent of “Warrington” (William S.
Robinson), and when he was editor of the _Boston Daily Republican_, she
made a prediction worthy of a male political prophet. In a letter dated
May 4, 1848, she writes:--
_Friend R._,--Probably no doubt exists but _some_ self-sacrificing
patriot may be found to accept the office of Chief Magistrate....
But who shall be the Whig candidate for this self-sacrifice, seems
the most prominent question. A few days since I met Horace Greeley,
and, as in duty bound, pronounced to him my _prophecy_ of who _could
not_ be a successful candidate, although, out of the numerous
aspirants for the Whig nomination, I could not prophecy who would
be successful.... Will you give the public my assurance that _Henry
Clay cannot be President of the United States_. I don’t care who the
Democratic nominee may be; I don’t care how divided that party may be
in action, nor how great may be the unanimity and enthusiasm of the
Whigs; but I repeat, Henry Clay cannot be President....