Mysterious Psychic Forces: An Account of the Author's Investigations in Psychical Research, Together with Those of Other European Savants
John Stuart Mill · en
As to the theory, the hypothesis of the fluid,--_felix qui potuit rerum
cognoscere causas_ (Happy the man who can know the cause of things)--I
shall return to this matter in the chapter on explanatory theories. But it
is incontestable that, in such experiences, we act by means of an
invisible force emanating from us. One must be blind not to admit that.
After a series of experiments so admirably conducted we can understand
that the author might well be allowed to indulge in a little derision of
obstinately prejudiced unbelievers. In closing this chapter, I cannot
forego the pleasure of citing Count de Gasparin apropos of the learned
negations of Babinet and his emulators of the Institute.
The savants are not the only ones to stand on their dignity. I also
stand on mine, and I make bold to think that a certificate signed with
my name would not be rated by anybody as a piece of imposture or
frivolity. It is known that I am in the habit of weighing my words; it
is known that I love the truth, and that I will not sacrifice it on
any consideration; it is known that I prefer to admit an error rather
than persist in it; and when, after a long-continued inquiry, I
persist with a firmer and profounder conviction than ever, the import
or scope of the declaration I make is not to be misapprehended.
I can tell you, in the next place, that the testimony of the eyes has,
in my opinion, a scientific value. Independently of instruments and
figures, on which I set the highest values, I believe that the true
_seeing_ of things may serve. I believe that this also is of itself an
instrument. If a sufficient number of good pairs of eyes have
ascertained and proved, ten, twenty, a hundred times, that a table is
put in motion without contact; if, furthermore, the explanation of the
fact by fraudulent or involuntary contacts passes the limits which
must be assigned to incredulity, the conclusion is clear. Nobody is
warranted in crying out: "You have neither fluidometer nor alembic;
you do not give a specimen of your physical agent in a bottle; you do
not describe how it acts upon a column of mercury or upon the dip of a
needle. We don't believe you, for you have done nothing but see."
"I do not believe you because you have done nothing but see!" "I do
not believe you because I have not seen with my own eyes!" So many
pedants, so many objections. They hardly take the trouble to agree
among themselves; in a war waged against the tables any weapon is
fair, nothing comes amiss.