Mysterious Psychic Forces: An Account of the Author's Investigations in Psychical Research, Together with Those of Other European Savants
John Stuart Mill · en
_Levitations._--One day we improvised an experiment in the afternoon,
and I remember that I observed a very interesting levitation made
under these circumstances. It was about five o'clock in the evening
(at any rate it was broad daylight), in the salon at l'Agnelas. We
took our places about the table, _standing_. Eusapia took the hand of
one of us and placed it on the corner of the table, at her right. The
table thereupon rose up to the height of our foreheads; that is to
say, the top of the table rose at least as high as five feet above the
floor.
Such experiments were very convincing, for it was impossible for
Eusapia, the circumstances being such as they were, to lift the table
by a normal act. It is enough to suppose that she merely touched the
corner of the table, to find out how heavy a weight she would have had
to lift if she had made a muscular movement. Besides, she had not a
sufficient grip on the table to lift it. Evidently, the conditions of
the experiment being such, she could not make use of one of the
fraudulent processes mentioned by her critics, such as straps or hooks
of any kind. The phenomenon is undeniably authentic.
The breathing seems to have a very great influence. In the way things
take place, it seems as if the sitters released, by breathing, an
amount of motor energy comparable to that which they release when
rapidly moving their limbs. There is something in this very curious
and difficult to explain.
The more complete analysis of the facts allows us to think that the
liberation of the energy employed depends upon the contraction of the
muscles and not upon the movement made. The thing which reveals this
peculiarity is easy to observe. When we are forming the chain about
the table, we can set up a movement without contact by mutually
pressing our hands together with a certain force, or by pressing the
feet hard upon the floor. The first of these means is much the better
of the two. The arms have only made an insignificant movement, and one
can say that the muscular contraction is almost the only physiological
phenomenon observable. Yet it suffices.
All these authenticated experiments tend to show that the agent which
determines movements without contact has some connection with our
organism, and probably with our nervous system.