Peru: a land of contrast — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Peru: a land of contrast
John Stuart Mill · en
But what can be said of the jungle? Had we thought of gardens as
suitably placed in tree-tops? Or of an edge of wood as sharp as an edge
of steel? Here accustomed flowers grow as shrubs, and shrubs as trees.
It is a region where insects are mistaken for birds, where animals
imitate a flower on the branch where they like to rest; where plants
have fragrance, and blossoms burst forth from roots or rough bark;
where birds gain protection by assuming the dazzling colors of tropical
sunlight, and butterflies by the warning colors of their neighbors.
It is a region where roots grow in the air; oils, wax, and honey are
secreted by leaves; where the death of anything gives new, vital
impulse to something else, and parasites are as significant as their
supporters. Curious region, where there are night-flying butterflies
and softly-feathered moths to fly in the daytime; where everything is
reversed: animals, whose normal is upside down, prefer tree-tops to the
ground, birds of prey are frightened by the painting on a butterfly’s
wings, caterpillars sting, spiders kill birds, and water is the
principal element of the land.
Dramatic indeed is the silent jungle. The insect is imprisoned in the
throat of the orchid, whose honey it had been unwarily seeking. Trees
distil venom. Plants have fangs. Perfumes affect the brain. Cold, green
creepers blister like fire. From vampires which suck your blood as you
sleep, to the touch of a vine which paralyzes your entire body, the
jungle knows all modes of attack and furnishes the cure for every ill
it has created.
What can be taken as the symbol of the jungle? The snake, mysterious,
deadly, bound together in savage traditions with lightning, wind,
fire-streams of lava, and river-whirlpools, those emblems of serpent
treachery? Or butterflies, with their symbolism of life-recurrent? Or
the orchid, emblem of wayward unwholesomeness? In the troops of monkeys
which skip, swing, bounce from tree to tree, throwing themselves to be
caught by prehensile tails, is its exuberance. In the honey dripping
from hollow trees and running off unused, is typified its surplus.
Iridescence darting from insects and from birds, rainbows glinting over
cataracts or caught by the equatorial sunshine from misty hillsides,
might be its symbol; or the beneficence of jungle trees and bushes.
Not one would be more or less typical than any other. All are equally
emblematic. If we think of caprice, there is law; of life, there is
death; of beauty, there is horror. When each seems most dominant, then
its opposite is most uncontrolled.
The seed dies that the plant may live; the blossom withers that the
fruit may set; the worm vanishes that the butterfly may spread its wide
wings and fly. Plus and minus signs are never far apart indeed.
CONCLUSION