Peru: a land of contrast — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Peru: a land of contrast
John Stuart Mill · en
Of all the general works on Peru none has greater weight than _Peru;
Beobachtungen und Studien_ (1893) by E. W. Middendorf. He has exploited
the country in a large, three-volume work with such German thoroughness
that hardly a fact has been left for subsequent writers to disclose.
I have referred to it constantly. Other shorter, general studies of
the country are Von Tschudi’s _Reisen durch Südamerika_, giving much
attention to folk-lore, and _Twenty Years’ Residence in South America_
(1825) by W. B. Stevenson, secretary to Lord Cochrane. He traveled far
and wide in Peru and made observations in regard to remote details.
Typical of descriptive writings is _Two Years in Peru_ (1876) by T. J.
Hutchinson. Various general works by Bernard Moses and his publications
in the _University of California Chronicle_ are valuable, notably his
work on the produce of the mines.
Reliable observations on ruins are those made by E. G. Squier in his
_Peru: Travel and Exploration in the Land of the Incas_, by Mariano
Rivero y Juan de Tschudi in _Antiguedades Peruanas_, and by Charles
Wiener in _Pérou et Bolivie_. Studies of ruins in particular localities
have been made by many archaeologists; for example, on Tiahuanacu,
L. Angrand, in _Antiquités Américaines_, though his book is now out
of date, Adolph F. Bandelier in his _Islands of Titicaca and Koati_,
Max Uhle, with whom I visited some of the ruins, on Tiahuanacu and
Pachacamac, and Hiram Bingham in recent explorations.
Sir Clements Markham has spent more than fifty years studying every
stage of Peru’s history from the time when it was a land of myth to the
Chilian war. His researches as well as his careful translations have
been published in a series of volumes. Authorities on various periods
of the history are legion. Relating to pre-Inca times, in which studies
of myths and theories of ruins are intermingled, original sources are
the _Memorias Historiales_ of Montesinos, first published in French in
1840, and Cieza de Leon, the soldier, whose _Crónica del Perú_ (1553)
is authority on the Incas. Some modern scientists who have written
about the pre-Inca period are Ernest Desjardins in his _Pérou avant la
Conquête Espagnole_, Tylor’s _Primitive Culture_, Meyen’s _Uber die
Ureinwohner von Peru_, and Brinton in his _Myths of the New World_ and
other works. Many persons are studying the legends, as, for instance,
Professor Liborio Zerda of the University at Bogotá. The _Miscelaneas
Australes_ of Miguel Cavello Balboa, a soldier, is an original source
for knowledge of the remote Chimus. _Das Reich der Chimus_ by Otto von
Buchwald, and especially _Das Muchik oder die Chimu Sprache_ by Doctor
Middendorf, who quotes largely from Calancha and Carrera, are modern
authorities.