The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
But what a fascinating picture of the ultimate structure of matter has
been presented by this voyage to the land of the infinitely small!
Only two ultimate entities have we been able to see there, namely,
positive and negative electrons; alike in the magnitude of their charge
but differing fundamentally in mass; the positive being eighteen
hundred and forty-five times heavier than the negative; both being so
vanishingly small that hundreds of them can somehow get inside a volume
which is still a pin point after all dimensions have been swelled
ten billion times: the ninety-two different elements of the world
determined simply by the difference between the number of positives
and negatives which have been somehow packed into the nucleus; all
these elements transmutable, ideally at least, into one another by a
simple change in this difference. Has nature a way of making these
transmutations in her laboratories? She is doing it under our eyes in
the radioactive process—a process which we have very recently found
is not at all confined to the so-called radioactive elements but is
possessed in very much more minute degree by many, if not all, of the
elements. Does the process go on in both directions, heavier atoms
being continually formed as well as continually disintegrating into
lighter ones? Not on the earth so far as we can see. Perhaps in God’s
laboratories, the stars. Some day we shall be finding out.
[Pg 209]
Can we on the earth artificially control the process? To a very slight
degree we know already how to disintegrate artificially, but not as
yet how to build up. As early as 1912, in the Ryerson Laboratory at
Chicago, Dr. Winchester and I thought we had good evidence that we were
knocking hydrogen out of aluminum and other metals by very powerful
electrical discharges in vacuo. There may be some doubt about
the character of this evidence now. But, certainly, Rutherford has been
doing just this for three years past by bombarding the nuclei of atoms
with -rays. How much farther can we go in this artificial
transmutation of the elements? This is one of the supremely interesting
problems of modern physics to which there is as yet no answer.
VI. THE BOHR ATOM