The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
Fifty years ago it was considered the triumph of the instrument-maker’s
art that a balance had been made so sensitive that one could weigh a
piece of paper, then write his name with a hard pencil on the paper
and determine the difference between the new weight and the old—that
is, the weight of the name. This meant determining a weight as small
as one-tenth or possibly one-hundredth of a milligram (a milligram is
about ¹⁄₃₀₀₀₀ of an ounce). Some five years ago Ramsay and Spencer,
in London, by constructing a balance entirely out of very fine quartz
fibers and placing it in a vacuum, succeeded in weighing objects as
small as one-millionth of a milligram, that is, they pushed the limit
[Pg 104]
of the weighable down about ten thousand times. The work which we are
now considering pushed it down at least ten thousand times farther
and made it possible to weigh accurately bodies so small as not to be
visible at all to the naked eye. For it is only necessary to float
such a body in the air, render it visible by reflected light in an
ultra-microscope arrangement of the sort we were using, charge it
electrically by the capture of ions, count the number of electrons in
its charge by the method described, and then vary the potential applied
to the plates or the charge on the body until its weight is just
balanced by the upward pull of the field. The weight of the body is
then exactly equal to the product of the known charge by the strength
of the electric field. We made all of our weightings of our drops
and the determination of their radii in this way as soon as we had
located with a sufficient degree of precision to warrant it.[52]
Indeed, even before is very accurately known it is possible to
use such a balance for a fairly accurate evaluation of the radius of a
spherical drop. For when we replace in (18) by
and solve for a we obtain
The substitution in this equation of an approximately correct value
of yields with an error but one-third as great as that
contained in the assumed value of , for is seen from this
equation to vary as the cube root of . This is the method which,
in view of the accurate evaluation of , it is now desirable to
[Pg 105]
use for the determination of the weight or dimensions of any minute
body, for the method is quite independent of the nature of the body
or of the medium in which it is immersed. Indeed, it constitutes as
direct and certain a weighing of the body as though it were weighed on
a mechanical balance.
VI. THE EVALUATION OF AND
With and known, we can easily determine
and from the equation
for if we write this equation in the form