The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
The experimental arrangements are shown in Fig. 7. The brass vessel
was built for work at all pressures up to 15 atmospheres, but
since the present observations have to do only with pressures from
76 cm. down, these were measured with a very carefully made mercury
manometer , which at atmospheric pressure gave precisely the
[Pg 112]
same reading as a standard barometer. Complete stagnancy of the air
between the condenser plates and was attained, first,
by absorbing all of the heat rays from the arc by means of a
water cell , 80 cm. long, and a cupric chloride cell , and,
secondly, by immersing the whole vessel in a constant temperature
bath of gas-engine oil (40 liters), which permitted, in general,
fluctuations of not more than .02° C. during an observation. This
constant-temperature bath was found essential if such consistency of
measurement as is shown here was to be obtained. A long search for
causes of slight irregularity revealed nothing so important as this,
and after the bath was installed all of the irregularities vanished.
The atomizer was blown by means of a puff of carefully dried and
dust-free air introduced through cock . The air about the drop
was ionized when desired, or electrons discharged directly from the
drop, by means of Röntgen rays from X, which readily passed through the
glass window . To the three windows (two only are shown)
in the brass vessel correspond, of course, three windows in the
ebonite strip , which encircles the condenser plates and
. Through the third of these windows, set at an angle of about
28° from the line and in the same horizontal plane, the oil
drop is observed through a short-focus telescope having a scale in the
eyepiece to make possible the exact measurement of the speeds of the
droplet-star.
In plotting the actual observations I have used the
reciprocal of the pressure in place of , for the reason
that is a theoretical quantity which is necessarily proportional
to , while is the quantity actually measured.
[Pg 113]
This amounts to writing the correction-term to Stokes’s
Law in the form instead
of in the form and
considering the undetermined constant which is to be
evaluated, as was before, by dividing the slope of our
line by its -intercept.