The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
John Stuart Mill · en
In 1827 the English botanist, Robert Brown, first made mention of the
fact that minute particles of dead matter in suspension in liquids
can be seen in a high-power microscope to be endowed with irregular
wiggling motions which strongly suggest “life.”[70] Although this
phenomenon was studied by numerous observers and became known as the
phenomenon of the Brownian movements, it remained wholly unexplained
for just fifty years. The first man to suggest that these motions were
due to the continual bombardment to which these particles are subjected
because of the motion of thermal agitation of the molecules of the
surrounding medium was the Belgian Carbonelle, whose work was first
published by his collaborator, Thirion, in 1880,[71] although three
years earlier Delsaulx[72] had given expression to views of this sort
but had credited Carbonelle with priority in adopting them. In 1881
Bodoszewski[73] studied the Brownian movements of smoke particles and
other suspensions in air and saw in them “an approximate image of the
movements of the gas molecules as postulated by the kinetic theory of
gases.” Others, notably Gouy,[74] urged during the next twenty years
[Pg 146]
the same interpretation, but it was not until 1905 that a way was found
to subject the hypothesis to a quantitative test. Such a test became
possible through the brilliant theoretical work of Einstein[75] of
Bern, Switzerland, who, starting merely with the assumption that the
mean kinetic energy of agitation of a particle suspended in a fluid
medium must be the same as the mean kinetic energy of agitation of
a gas molecule at the same temperature, developed by unimpeachable
analysis an expression for the mean distance through which such a
particle should drift in a given time through a given medium because of
this motion of agitation. This distance could be directly observed and
compared with the theoretical value. Thus, suppose one of the wiggling
particles is observed in a microscope and its position noted on a scale
in the eyepiece at a particular instant, then noted again at the end of
(for example, 10) seconds, and the displacement
in that time along one particular axis recorded. Suppose a large number
of such displacements in intervals all of length
are observed, each one of them squared, and the mean of these squares
taken and denoted by : Einstein showed that
the theoretical value of should be
in which is the universal gas constant per gram molecule, namely,
,
the temperature on the absolute scale, the number of molecules
in one gram molecule, and a resistance factor depending upon
[Pg 147]
the viscosity of the medium and the size of the drop, and representing
the ratio between the force applied to the particle in any way and the
velocity produced by that force. If Stokes’s Law, namely,
, held for the motion of the particle
through the medium, then would have the value
, so that Einstein’s formula would become