The Geneva Protocol — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Geneva Protocol
John Stuart Mill · en
Article 14 is in perfect keeping with the last paragraphs of Articles
10 and 11. In the paragraphs in question, the coming into operation of
the sanctions depends upon an injunction by the Council; it therefore
also devolves upon the Council to declare that the object for which the
sanctions were applied has been attained. Just as the application of
the sanctions is a matter for the States, so it rests with them to
liquidate the operations undertaken with a view to resisting the act of
aggression.
_Article 15._
Paragraph 1 is similar to Article 10 of the Draft Treaty of Mutual
Assistance drawn up last year.
Paragraph 2 is designed to prevent the sanctions provided for in
Article 11 from undergoing any change in character during the process
of execution and developing into a war of annexation.
In view of the observations of various delegations regarding the
punishment of the aggressor, it should be added that it would be
incorrect to interpret this article as meaning that the only penalties
to be apprehended by the aggressor as the result of his act shall be
the burdens referred to in paragraph 1. If {206} necessary, securities
against fresh aggression, or pledges guaranteeing the fulfilment of the
obligations imposed in accordance with paragraph 1, might be required.
Only annexation of territory and measures involving the loss of
political independence are declared inadmissible.
"Territory" is to be taken to mean the whole territory of a State, no
distinction being made between the mother-country and the colonies.
5.--REDUCTION OF ARMAMENTS.
_Articles 17 and 21._
Although it has not been possible to solve the problem of the reduction
of armaments in the clauses of the document submitted to the Assembly
for approval, our work paves the way to it and makes it possible.
The reduction of armaments will result, in the first place, from the
general security created by a diminution of the dangers of war arising
from the compulsory pacific settlement of all disputes.
It will also ensue from the certainty which any State attacked will
have of obtaining the economic and financial support of all the
signatory States, and such support would be especially important should
the aggressor be a great Power, capable of carrying on a long war.
Nevertheless, for States which, owing to their geographical position,
are especially liable to attack, and for States whose most important
centres are adjacent to their frontiers, the dangers of a sudden attack
are so great that it will not be possible for them to base any plan for
the reduction of their armaments simply upon the political and economic
factors referred to above, no matter what the importance of such
factors may be.