The History of Chivalry; Or, Knighthood and Its Times, Volume 1 (of 2)
John Stuart Mill · en
[313] Knights are always mentioned as good or unskilful tilters, according
to the judgment of the ladies. Froissart, vol. ii. c. 234. Monstrelet,
vol. i. c. 10.; and see the last note.
[314] The account of every tournament in our grave old chronicles warrants
the sentence in the Romance of Perceforest, "Pris ne doit ne peult estre
donne sans les _dames_; car pour elles sont toutes les prouesses fautes."
[315] This form of thanks prevailed also at the joust, as we learn from an
account of one in the days of Edward IV. See Lansdowne MSS., British
Museum, No. 285. art. 7.
[316] Ritterzeit und Ritterwesen, vol. i. p. 346.
[317] A tournament of this three-fold description took place at St. Denys,
in the year 1389.
[318] The love of our ancestors for tournaments is evident in a curious
passage of an ancient satirical poem, which Strutt has thus rendered:
"If wealth, Sir Knight, perchance be thine,
In tournaments you're bound to shine;
Refuse--and all the world will swear,
You die not worth a rotten pear."
[319] Mr. Sharon Turner (History of England, vol. i. p. 144. 4to. edit.)
says, that nothing could break the custom (of holding tournaments) but the
increased civilisation of the age. This is a mistake, for tournaments
increased in number as the world became more civilised. There were more
tournaments in the fourteenth century than in the thirteenth, and even so
late as the reign of Henry VIII. the whole of England seems to have been
parcelled out into tilting grounds.
[320] "De his vero qui in torneamentis cadunt, nulla quæstio est, quin
vadant ad inferos, si non fuerint adjuti beneficio contritionis." Du Cange
on Joinville, Dissert. 6.
[321] Still more absurd is the story of Matthew Paris, that Roger de
Toeny, a valiant knight, appeared after death to his brother Raoul, and
thus addressed him: "Jam et pænas vidi malorum, et gaudio beatorum; nec
non supplicia magna, quibus miser deputatus sum, oculis meis conspexi. Væ,
væ mihi, quare unquam torneamenta exercui, et ea tanto studio dilexi?"
[322] Thus Lambert d'Ardres writes: "Cum omnino tunc temporis propter
Dominici sepulchri peregrinationem in toto orbe, interdicta fuissent
torneamenta." Du Cange, Diss. 6. on Joinville.
[323] Du Cange calls any combat between two knights preliminary to a
general battle, a joust to the utterance. He might as well have called the
battle itself a joust.
[324] The agreement was made in legal form, as we learn from Wyntown. Sir
David de Lindsay had a safe-conduct for his purpose, and came to London
with a retinue of twenty-eight persons,--
"Where he and all his company
Was well arrayed, and daintily,
And all purveyed at device.
There was his purpose to win prize:
With the Lord of the Wellis he
Thought til have done there a _journée_ (day's battle),
For both they were by _certane taillé_
Obliged to do there that deed, _sauf faillie_ (without fail)."