The Millbank Case: A Maine Mystery of To-day — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Millbank Case: A Maine Mystery of To-day
John Stuart Mill · en
“I spent the night there,” Trafford answered.
“Was the night disturbed?”
“An attempt was made to arrest a murderer, who escaped into the woods,
but not without a severe wound, I think.”
“I have a message for the man who attempted to make the arrest.”
“You can deliver it to me,” said Trafford.
“You say the man was a murderer. I have no wish to know his name; but
I am charged only to speak to one man, and I shall know him by a name.
You can give it me?”
“If it’s my name you want, it’s Trafford. The murderer attempted first
to rob or murder me in the covered bridge at Millbank, before he
committed the actual murder,” answered the detective.
“I did not doubt before,” the priest answered, with something of
stateliness; “only when a trust is given, one must be certain. The
message is that the man who was drowned was not murdered. It was an
accident, in which the one barely escaped and was unable to save the
other.”
“Even so,” Trafford retorted, “the other might have had a chance to
escape, if it hadn’t been for a broken collar-bone, and for that the
man who denies the murder was responsible.”
“But it was by mistake he inflicted it,” the priest answered.
“By mistake, because he missed the man he intended to strike and hit
his associate in crime. He was in the bridge to rob and probably to
murder, and if the death of his companion was directly accidental, it
came through a violation of the law and that makes it murder.”
“In the eyes of the law, possibly,” the priest said; “but we look to
the intent. The man did not intend to kill his associate. He died as
the result of an accident.”
“Are you permitted to give me details?” Trafford asked, wisely avoiding
a discussion that might return again and again on itself without actual
progress.