The Old Red Sandstone; or, New Walks in an Old Field — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Old Red Sandstone; or, New Walks in an Old Field
John Stuart Mill · en
The ability displayed by Cuvier in restoring, from a few broken
fragments of bone, the skeleton of the entire animal to which
the fragments had belonged, astonished the world He had learned
to interpret signs as incomprehensible to every one else as the
mysterious handwriting on the wall had been to the courtiers of
Belshazzar. The condyle of a jaw became in his hands a key to
the character of the original possessor; and in a few mouldering
vertebræ, or in the dilapidated bones of a fore-arm or a foot, he
could read a curious history of habits and instincts. In common
with several gentlemen of Edinburgh, all men known to science, I
was as much struck with the skill displayed by Agassiz in piecing
together the fragments of the huge crustacean of Balruddery, and
in demonstrating its nature as such. The numerous specimens of Mr.
Webster were opened out before us. On a previous morning I had
examined them, as I have said, in the company of Mr. Murchison and
Dr. Buckland; they had been seen also by Lord Greenock, Dr. Traill,
and Mr. Charles M'Laren; and their fragments of new and undescribed
fishes had been at once recognized with reference to at least their
class. But the collection contained organisms of a different kind,
which seemed inexplicable to all--forms of various design, but so
regularly mathematical in their outlines that they might be all
described by a ruler and a pair of compasses, and yet the whole were
covered by seeming scales. There were the fragments of scaly rhombs,
of scaly crescents, of scaly circles, with scaly parallelograms
attached to them, and of several other regular compound figures
besides. Mr. Murchison, familiar with the older fossils, remarked the
close resemblance of the seeming scales to those of the _Seraphim_
of Forfarshire, but deferred the whole to the judgment of Agassiz; no
one else hazarded a conjecture. Agassiz glanced over the collection.
One specimen especially caught his attention--an elegantly
symmetrical one. It seemed a combination of the parallelogram and
the crescent: there were pointed horns at each end; but the convex
and concave lines of the opposite sides passed into almost parallel
right lines towards the centre. His eye brightened as he contemplated
it. "I will tell you," he said, turning to the company--"I will tell
you what these are--the remains of a huge lobster." He arranged
the specimens in the group before him with as much apparent ease
as I have seen a young girl arranging the pieces of ivory or
mother-of-pearl in an Indian puzzle. A few broken pieces completed
the lozenge-shaped shield; two detached specimens, placed on its
opposite sides, furnished the claws; two or three semi-rings, with
serrated edges, composed the jointed body; the compound figure,
which but a minute before had so strongly attracted his attention,
furnished the terminal flap; and there lay the huge lobster before
us, palpable to all. There is homage due to supereminent genius,