E. Wölfflin (_Sitzungsberichte der k. b. Akad. der Wissenschaften zu München_, 1889, pp. 323 _sqq._, and ed. of the _Bell. Afr._, 1889) holds the same views as Landgraf, and gives many instances of difference in diction between _Bell. Afr._ on the one hand, and _Gall._ viii. and _Alex._ on the other; _e.g._ _Bell. Afr._ _Bell. Gall._ viii.; _Bell. Alex._ _suppetiae_, - 7 times - never. _convallis_, - 5 " - _vallis_, 10 times. _convulnero_, - 9 " - _vulnero_ (as in Caesar). _contendo_ + infin., 20 " - never. _adorior_, - 14 " - only in _Gall._ viii. 34. _adgredior_, - never - 14 times. _grandis_, - 7 times - _magnus_. _subito_, - 22 " - never. _repente_, - never - 16 times. _postquam_, - 34 " - not in _Gall._ viii. hist. infin., - 24 " - never. On the other hand, Widmann, _Philologus_, L. (1891), p. 565, proves that the author of the note-book worked up in the _Bell. Afr._ was an officer of the 5th legion, that Pollio was not connected with the 5th legion, and probably did not go through the whole African war, as the author clearly must have done. This, of course, also proves that Hirtius cannot have been the author. On the whole, we think it proved that the _Bell. Afr._ was not written by the author of _B. Gall._ viii. and _B. Alex._, and that the author was not in any case Pollio. The _B. Alex._ is probably worked up from note-books written by several hands. The attempt to distinguish the work of Hirtius and another hand in _B. Gall._ viii. is against the evidence of Suetonius; and though several hands have co-operated in _B. Alex._, it is hardly possible to distinguish them precisely. The _Bell. Hisp._ is evidently the work of an eye-witness, cf. c. 29, 'nostri ad dimicandum procedunt, id quod adversarios existimabamus esse facturos.' He is apt to be bombastic (c. 5, 'hic alternis non solum morti mortem exaggerabant, sed tumulos tumulis exaequabant'), and makes a ridiculous show of learning (quoting the combat of Achilles and Memnon, c. 25, and Ennius, c. 23, 'nostri cessere parumper'; c. 31, 'pes pede premitur, armis teruntur arma.') (3) CAESAR'S LOST WORKS. 1. _De Analogia_, a treatise on grammar in two Books, dedicated to Cicero (Cic. _Brut._ 253) and composed in the interval between two of the campaigns in Gaul. Sueton. _Iul._ 56, 'Reliquit et de Analogia duos libros ... In transitu Alpium, cum ex citeriore Gallia conventibus peractis ad exercitum rediret ... fecit.' It supported the view that _analogia_, not _anomalia_, should be the governing principle in grammar, _i.e._ that order should be introduced into the chaos of varying usages. Gellius i. 10, 4 has a notable quotation from the first Book, 'Habe semper in memoria atque in pectore, ut tamquam scopulum sic fugias inauditum atque insolens verbum.'