The training of teachers in the United States of America — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The training of teachers in the United States of America
John Stuart Mill · en
The Clark University is unfortunately not open to women, if the summer
school (to which they are admitted) be not considered.
Students are expected to possess a reading knowledge of the French and
German languages, and a knowledge of Elementary Psychology is also
considered desirable.
There are many other Universities which have opened more or less
complete pedagogical departments; but these which have been described
will suffice to give a general idea of the courses offered in them. On
the whole it appeared to me that while in America excellent provision
is made in many of the States for the training of teachers for the
Primary Schools on the one hand, and for the positions of professors,
lecturers, superintendents on the other, far too little attention is
given to the training of teachers for the High, Collegiate and Private
Schools. High School teachers are mainly those who have worked their
way up through the grades (salaries tend to increase with the grade,
which brings about that inexperienced teachers are too often put to
the lower classes), while the teachers in Collegiate and Private
Schools have usually taken up the work straight from college without
any special preparation at all. England and Wales have, I think, made
much better provision for the training of such teachers, but I think we
have a good deal to learn from America in providing for the training
of lecturers, school inspectors, etc., etc., and perhaps also in the
matter of setting the seal of University approval upon training, by the
bestowal of educational degrees.
_TEACHERS’ INSTITUTES._
Teachers’ Institutes form an integral part of most state and city
systems of education. They have been defined as “normal schools with
a very short course,” and this definition is substantially correct.
The work done by them is of much the same character as that done in
the Normal Schools, and they have the same end in view--that of making
teachers more fit for their profession. They, however, vary somewhat in
character, and it will be perhaps well to distinguish between--
1. Those which are held on Saturdays for teachers in the city or
district, and which are usually conducted by the superintendent,
who gives lectures on the Science and Art of Teaching, discusses
educational problems and methods, or follows out with them a
course of reading. Attendance at these institutes is often made
compulsory, and loss of part of salary is sometimes made the penalty
for non-attendance. By the statistics returned from ninety-six
cities holding institutes, it appears that forty-four thus enforce
attendance.
2. Those lasting for about six to ten days, having short courses in
certain subjects, and especially on the theory of teaching. These are
usually those organized by the State Superintendent, who has however
the power of delegating the conduct of these institutes to other
persons whom he may deem qualified. Again, attendance at many of
these is made compulsory.