The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918 — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918
John Stuart Mill · en
Very little now remains to be said. The N.U.W.S.S. has changed its
name and extended its objects as described in the following chapter. I
am in hearty sympathy with this development, but I felt that my years
entitled me in the future to a less strenuous existence. I therefore
resigned my presidency of the union, and it was a matter of sincere
satisfaction to me that my old friend and colleague, Miss Eleanor
Rathbone, was elected as my successor.
CHAPTER X
THE DIFFERENCE THE VOTE HAS MADE
"In the United States the grant of women's suffrage has made no
difference whatever ... the mere fact that women have a right to
vote makes no difference at all."—Viscount Bryce, in House of Lords,
December 17th, 1917.
The words quoted above come strangely from the lips of any man who
believes in the principles of free representative government. If the
vote makes no difference, why have our race all over the world attached
such enormous importance to it? It is bred in our bone, and will never
come out of the flesh, that the possession of the franchise is the
very foundation-stone of political freedom. Our fifty years' struggle
for the women's vote was not actuated by our setting any extraordinary
value on the mere power of making a mark on a voting paper once in
every three or four years. We did not, except as a symbol of free
citizenship, value it as a thing good in itself; we valued it, not as
a ribbon to stick in our coat, but for the sake of the equal laws, the
enlarged opportunities, the improved status for women which we knew it
involved. We worked for it with ardour and passion because it was stuff
of the conscience with us that it would benefit not women only, but
the whole community; this is what we meant when we called our paper
the _Common Cause_. It was the cause of men, women, and children. We
believe that men cannot be truly free so long as women are held in
political subjection.
We have at present—November, 1919—only a very short experience of the
actual results of women's suffrage. It is less than two years since
the parliamentary battle was won, and less than one year since women
voted for the first time, but already the practical results of women's
suffrage have surpassed our expectations. It is no exaggeration to say
that those most closely in touch with work in Parliament on subjects
affecting the welfare and status of women were conscious of a change in
the atmosphere of the House immediately after the passing of the Reform
Bill of 1918.