Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff
Nietzsche · en
Who has played Chopin in a remarkable manner? The list is not large.
Chopin himself must have been the greatest of all, though Liszt
declared that his physical strength was not able to cope with the
more heroic of his works. Liszt, Tausig, Rubinstein, Essipoff,
Joseffy, Karl Heymann, Pachmann, and Paderewski—a somewhat
attenuated number of names. Of course there were many others; but
these represent supreme mastery in various phases of the master’s
music. The real pupils all claimed to have inherited the magic
formula, the tradition. To-day the best-known Chopin players are
Joseffy, Rosenthal, Pachmann, Paderewski, and others. Each has
his virtues, and to define their limitations, enunciate their
excellences, would be critical hair-splitting. Nearly all the younger
professional men and women play Chopin after approved academic
models. He is expounded by æstheticians and taught throughout the
land. He is mauled, maimed, thumped, and otherwise maltreated at
conservatories, and the soul of him is seldom invoked, but floats, a
wraith with melancholy eyes, over nearly every piano in Christendom.
There have been and are charming interpreters of his music among
women pianists. Paderewski told me that he never heard the mazurkas
better played than by Marcelline, Princess Czartoryska, a beloved
pupil of Chopin’s. We have never had the mazurkas so charmingly
played here as by the wilful Vladimir de Pachmann; yet not even his
dearest foe would dower that artist with great mental ability. But he
is more feminine than any woman in his tactile sensibilities. Joseffy
has far more intellectuality; Paderewski is more poetic. All three
are, as all musical artists should be, feminine in their delicacy of
temperament.
Where, then, does woman enter this race, a race in which sex
traditions are topsy-turvied? If women are deficient in brain weight,
in nervous and spiritual powers, how is it that they dare attempt
Chopin at all?
Because, patient reader—and now I begin to draw in the very large
loop I have made—men of science deal with the palpable, and
the time for measuring and weighing the impalpable has not yet
arrived. Because there is no sex in music, and because you may not
be very moral or very intellectual, and yet play Chopin like “a
little god”—as Pachmann would say. And now for my most triumphant
contention: if the majority of women play Chopin abominably—so do the
majority of men!
II