Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff
Nietzsche · en
This was written in 1839. If Balzac had lived a half-century, he
would have painted full-length portraits of women who keep quiet
neither in triumph nor in defeat; and at whose feet pedals, not
men, register new emotional experiences—for the pedals of the piano
are the soul of it. To be ashamed of one’s sex nowadays would be
an insane confession wrung from some poor overworked creature, one
to whom the French novelist might refuse even the name of woman.
Females may deny the beauty of being born to wear petticoats; women,
never. Indeed, the boot is now on the masculine leg. As the current
phraseology runs, Woman has found herself. She has also found a
panacea for irritated vanity and indigestion, at one time called in
romances a broken heart. This prophylactic is art; and when it is
used intelligently, misery flies forth from the window as music opens
the door.
Once, for the sheer fun of it, I made an imaginary classification
of music which various heroines of fiction preferred, or, rather,
might prefer—for many of them are, as you know, tone-deaf. Mr.
Howells remarked this years ago. But consider Clarissa Harlowe, or
any of the immortal Jane’s brood—do they not all suggest musical
possibilities? What a paper that would be to read before a mothers’
meeting on a sultry day in September!—The Musical Tastes of Fiction’s
Heroines. And with what facile logic, the logic of numbers, a clever
girl could unhorse her ruder opponents. The theme fascinates me; I
am loath to leave it. Think of the year 1800! Beethoven had written
some piano sonatas, but was not very well known abroad. In London
town there were still harpsichords, and Scarlatti and Mozart. The
modern grand piano was a dream that nestled in the later sonatas of
Beethoven—and in the brain of their maker. Tone was not thought of;
while a pearly touch, smooth scales, and crisp little rhythms were
affected by such women as spared the time to practise from their
social duties. The piano music of the eighteenth century was written
for women, is woman’s music. All these virginals, spinets, clavecins,
clavichords, harpsichords, are they not feminine? Are they not the
musical rib plucked by an amiable fate from the side of the masculine
church organ? Historical retrospects gall the mind at all times,
but it may not be amiss to consider the century’s piano music which
preceded ours. Out of the old dance suites burgeoned latter-day
piano music. Those graceful writers of old Italy and old France made
gay melodies, full of the artificial life of their time, of their
surroundings. You catch glimpses of delicate faces, with patches,
powdered heads, courtly struttings, and the sounds of courtly wooing.
The stately minuetto, lively courantes, decorous allemandes, smooth
sarabands, tripping gavottes and gigues,—all these, and many more
with high-colored titles, enchanted our great-great-grandmothers. The
more tragic note was not missing, either. They had L’Homicide and the