Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff
Nietzsche · en
Oh may I join the choir invisible
Of those immortal dead who live again
In minds made better by their presence: live
In pulses stirred to generosity,
... in scorn
For miserable aims that end with self
would have been as silly as was the optimism of Leibnitz to
Schopenhauer. This Nietzsche was a terrible fellow, a very Berserker
in his mad rage against existing institutions. He used a battering
ram of rare dialectic skill, and crash go the religious, social, and
artistic fabrics reared ages since! But when the brilliant smoke
of his style clears away, we still see standing the same venerable
institutions. This tornadic philosopher does damage only to the
outlying structures. He lets in light on some dark and dank places.
He is a tonic for malaria, musical and religious; and there is value
even in his own fantastic Transvaluation of all Values. I fancy
that if Friedrich Nietzsche had been a man of physical resources,
he would have been a soldier hero. The late Anton Seidl once told
me that he knew the unlucky man when he was a Wagnerian. He was
slight of stature, evidently of delicate health, but in his eyes
burned the restless fire of genius. If that same energy could have
been transmuted into action, he might have been a sane, healthy
man to-day. In all this he was not unlike Stendhal, of whom Jules
Lemaître wrote:—
“A grand man of action, paralyzed little by little by his
incomparable analysis.” Nietzsche burned his brain away by a too
strenuous analysis of life.
I can recommend to all Wagnerites Nietzsche’s Der Fall Wagner. It
is bound to take the edge off their uncritical worship. But read
it after the first study, Richard Wagner in Bayreuth. It will also
demonstrate that Wagner is great, and Wagnerism dangerous. Nietzsche
saw with clear eyes the peril that threatens music because of the
Wagnerian principles. We must never lose sight of the fact that with
Wagner the drama almost always takes precedence. His deviation from
his own theory was his artistic salvation. But there lies the danger
in him for young composers. He is a man of the theatre. His music,
divested of all the metaphysical verbiage heaped upon it by Wagner
and Wagnerian critics, is music of the footlights. A great formalist
he is; but it is Wagner’s form, not the form for orchestral writers.
It is all well enough to say that the symphony has had its day; but
its structure, despite numberless modifications, will survive as long
as absolute music itself. And music pure and simple, for itself,
undefiled by costumes, scenery, limelights, and vocal virtuosi, is
the noblest music of all.
Nietzsche writes of Germany as “being arbitrarily stupefied by itself
for nearly a thousand years.”