[Footnote 41: Stallbaum, Proleg. ad Plat. Euthydem. p. 30. "Cavendum est magnopere, ne quæ hic à Socrate disputantur, pro ipsius decretis habeamus: _sunt enim omnia ad mentem Sophistarum disputata_, quos ille, reprehensis eorum opinionibus, sperat eo adductum iri, ut gravem prudentemque earum defensionem suscipiant." Compare p. 66. Stallbaum says that Plato often reasons, adopting for the occasion the doctrine of the Sophists. See his Prolegg. to the Lachês and Charmidês, and still more his Proleg. to the Protagoras, where he tells us that Plato introduces his spokesman Sokrates not only as arguing _ex mente Sophistarum_, but also as employing captious and delusive artifice, such as in this dialogue is ascribed to Euthydemus and Dionysodorus.--pp. 23-24. "Itaque Socrates, missâ hujus rei disputatione, repentè ad alia progreditur, scilicet _similibus loqueis_ hominem denuo irretiturus. Nemini facilé obscurum erit, hoc quoque loco Protagoram _argutis conclusiunculis deludi_" (_i.e._ by Sokrates) "atque _callidé eo permoveri,_" &c. "Quanquam nemo erit, quin videat, _callidé deludi Protagoram_, ubi ex eo, quod qui injusté faciat, is neutiquam agat [Greek: sôphro/nôs], protinus colligitur justitiam et [Greek: sôphrosu/nê] unum idemque esse."--p. 25. "Disputat enim Socrates pleraque omnia ad mentem ipsius Protagoræ."--p. 30. "Platonem ipsum hæc non probâsse, sed e vulgi opinione et mente explicasse, vel illud non obscuré significat," &c.--p. 33.] [Side-note: Mistaken representations about the Sophists--Aristotle's definition--no distinguishable line can be drawn between the Sophist and the Dialectician.]