punished by them.[330] And after death, the reward of the just man, as well as the punishment of the unjust, will be far greater than even during life. [Footnote 328: Plato, Republic, x. p. 612 B-C.] [Footnote 329: Plato, Republic, x. pp. 612-613.] [Footnote 330: Plato, Republic, x. p. 613 C-D.] This latter position is illustrated at some length by the mythe with which the Republic concludes, describing the realm of Hades, with the posthumous condition and treatment of the departed souls. CHAPTER XXXVI. REPUBLIC--REMARKS ON ITS MAIN THESIS. [Side-note: Summary of the preceding chapter.] The preceding Chapter has described, in concise abstract, that splendid monument of Plato's genius, which passes under the name of the [Greek: Politei/a] or Republic. It is undoubtedly the grandest of all his compositions; including in itself all his different points of excellence. In the first Book, we have a subtle specimen of negative Dialectic,--of the Sokratic cross-examination or Elenchus. In the second Book, we find two examples of continuous or Ciceronian pleading (like that ascribed to Protagoras in the dialogue called by his name), which are surpassed by nothing in ancient literature, for acuteness and ability in the statement of a case. Next, we are introduced to Plato's most sublime effort of constructive ingenuity, in putting together both the individual man and the collective City: together with more information (imperfect as it is even here) about his Dialectic or Philosophy, than any other dialogue furnishes. The ninth Book exhibits his attempts to make good his own thesis against the case set forth in his own antecedent counter-pleadings. The last Book concludes with a highly poetical mythe, embodying a [Greek: Nekui/a] shaped after his own fancy,--and the outline of cosmical agencies afterwards developed, though with many differences, in the Timæus. The brilliancy of the Republic will appear all the more conspicuous, when we come to compare it with Plato's two posterior compositions: with the Pythagorean mysticism and theology of the Timæus--or with the severe and dictatorial solemnity of the Treatise De Legibus. [Side-note: Title of the Republic, of ancient date, but only a partial indication of its contents.] The title borne by this dialogue--the Republic or Polity--whether affixed by Plato himself or not, dates at least from his immediate disciples, Aristotle among them.[1] This title hardly presents a clear idea either of its proclaimed purpose or of its total contents. [Footnote 1: See Schleiermacher, Einl. zum Staat, p. 63 seq.; Stallbaum, Proleg. p. lviii. seq.]