Platonism in English poetry of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
Plato · en
“I love my Saviour, as he is _the Lord_, he that studies my salvation:
and as _Christ_, made a person able to work my salvation; but when I see
him in the third notion, _Jesus_, accomplishing my salvation, by an
actual death, I see those hands stretched out, that stretched out the
heavens, and those feet racked, to which they that racked them are
footstools: I hear him, from whom his nearest friends fled, pray for his
enemies, and him, whom his Father forsook, not forsake his brethren: I
see him that clothes this body with his creatures, or else it would
wither, and clothes this soul with his righteousness, or else it would
perish, hang naked upon the cross; ... when I conceit, when I
contemplate my Saviour thus, I love the _Lord_, and there is reverent
adoration in that love, I love _Christ_, and there is a mysterious
adoration in that love, but I love _Jesus_, and there is a tender
compassion in that love....” (Works, II. 181.)
Whenever Platonism enters into this tender passion it always elevates
the emotion into a higher region, where the more intellectual or
spiritual nature of Christ or God is the object of contemplation; and it
does this by affording the poets a conception of the object of the
soul’s highest love, as a philosophical principle, whether of beauty, of
good, or of true being.
The first way by which this elevation of a purely sensuous passion into
a higher region was effected was through the Platonic conception of the
“idea.” Plato had taught that in love the mind should pass from a sight
of the objects of beauty through ever widening circles of abstraction to
the contemplation of absolute beauty in its idea. This can be known only
by the soul, and is the only real beauty. Spenser’s “Hymne of Heavenly
Love” is the best example of the application of this idea to the love of
Christ. In this poem he sings the praise of Christ as the God of Love.
He finds the chief manifestation of Christ’s love in his sacrifice. At
first he treats this as a spectacle to move the eye. He dwells upon the
mangling of Christ’s body (ll. 241–247), and exhorts the beholder to
“bleede in every vaine,
At sight of his most sacred heavenly corse.”
(ll. 251–252.)
But later, instead of calling upon the beholder to lift up his “heavie
clouded eye” to behold such a manifestation of mercy (ll. 226–227), he
directs him to lift up his _mind_ and _meditate_ upon the author of his
salvation (l. 258). Christ’s love then will burn all earthly desire away
by the power of
“that celestiall beauties blaze,”
(l. 280.)
whose glory dazes the eye but illumines the spirit. And then, when this
final stage of refinement is past, the ravished soul of the beholder
shall have a sight not of
“his most sacred heavenly corse”
(l. 252.)
but of the very idea of his pure glory.