The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
In this respect, replied Simmias:—Suppose a person to
use the same argument about harmony and the lyre—might
he not say that harmony is a thing invisible, incorporeal,
perfect, divine, existing in the lyre which is harmonized, but 86
that the lyre and the strings are matter and material, composite,
earthy, and akin to mortality? And when some one
breaks the lyre, or cuts and rends the strings, then he who
takes this view would argue as you do, and on the same
analogy, that the harmony survives and has not perished—you
cannot imagine, he would say, that the lyre without the
strings, and the broken strings themselves which are mortal
remain, and yet that the harmony, which is of heavenly
and immortal nature and kindred, has perished—perished
before the mortal. The harmony must still be somewhere,
and the wood and strings will decay before anything
can happen to that. The thought, Socrates, must have
occurred to your own mind that such is our conception of the
soul; and that when the body is in a manner strung and
held together by the elements of hot and cold, wet and dry,
then the soul is the harmony or due proportionate admixture
of them. But if so, whenever the strings of the body are
unduly loosened or overstrained through disease or other
injury, then the soul, though most divine, like other harmonies
of music or works of art, of course perishes at once;
although the material remains of the body may last for a
considerable time, until they are either decayed or burnt.
And if any one maintains that the soul, being the harmony
of the elements of the body, is first to perish in that which is
called death, how shall we answer him?
Socrates looked fixedly at us as his manner was, and said
with a smile: Simmias has reason on his side; and why does
not some one of you who is better able than myself answer
him? for there is force in his attack upon me. But perhaps,
before we answer him, we had better also hear what Cebes
has to say that we may gain time for reflection, and when
they have both spoken, we may either assent to them, if
there is truth in what they say, or if not, we will maintain
our position. Please to tell me then, Cebes, he said, what
was the difficulty which troubled you?
[Sidenote: _The doubt of Cebes._]
[Sidenote: A weaver may outlive many coats and himself be outlived by the
last: so the soul which has passed through many bodies may in the end be
worn out.]