The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
_Phaed._ Often, Echecrates, I have wondered at Socrates,
but never more than on that occasion. That he should be 89
able to answer was nothing, but what astonished me was,
first, the gentle and pleasant and approving manner in which
he received the words of the young men, and then his quick
sense of the wound which had been inflicted by the argument,
and the readiness with which he healed it. He might be
compared to a general rallying his defeated and broken
army, urging them to accompany him and return to the field
of argument.
_Ech._ What followed?
_Phaed._ You shall hear, for I was close to him on his right
hand, seated on a sort of stool, and he on a couch which was
a good deal higher. He stroked my head, and pressed the
hair upon my neck—he had a way of playing with my hair;
and then he said: To-morrow, Phaedo, I suppose that these
fair locks of yours will be severed.
Yes, Socrates, I suppose that they will, I replied.
Not so, if you will take my advice.
What shall I do with them? I said.
To-day, he replied, and not to-morrow, if this argument dies
and we cannot bring it to life again, you and I will both
shave our locks: and if I were you, and the argument got
away from me, and I could not hold my ground against
Simmias and Cebes, I would myself take an oath, like the
Argives, not to wear hair any more until I had renewed the
conflict and defeated them.
Yes, I said; but Heracles himself is said not to be a match
for two.
Summon me then, he said, and I will be your Iolaus until
the sun goes down.
I summon you rather, I rejoined, not as Heracles summoning
Iolaus, but as Iolaus might summon Heracles.
That will do as well, he said. But first let us take care
that we avoid a danger.
[Sidenote: _We must not become misologists._]
Of what nature? I said.
[Sidenote: The danger of becoming haters of ideas greater than of
becoming haters of men.]
Lest we become misologists, he replied: no worse thing
can happen to a man than this. For as there are misanthropists
or haters of men, there are also misologists or
haters of ideas, and both spring from the same cause, which
is ignorance of the world. Misanthropy arises out of the too
great confidence of inexperience;—you trust a man and think
him altogether true and sound and faithful, and then in a
little while he turns out to be false and knavish; and then
another and another, and when this has happened several
times to a man, especially when it happens among those
whom he deems to be his own most trusted and familiar
friends, and he has often quarrelled with them, he at last
hates all men, and believes that no one has any good in him
at all. You must have observed this trait of character?
I have.