The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato · en
_Soc._ Remember that I did not ask you to give me two
or three examples of piety, but to explain the general idea
which makes all pious things to be pious. Do you not
recollect that there was one idea which made the impious
impious, and the pious pious?
_Euth._ I remember.
_Soc._ Tell me what is the nature of this idea, and then
I shall have a standard to which I may look, and by which
I may measure actions, whether yours or those of any one
else, and then I shall be able to say that such and such an
action is pious, such another impious.
_Euth._ I will tell you, if you like.
[Sidenote: A more correct definition:—Piety is that which is dear to the
gods.]
_Soc._ I should very much like.
_Euth._ Piety, then, is that which is dear to the gods, and
impiety is that which is not dear to them.
_Soc._ Very good, Euthyphro; you have now given me the 7
sort of answer which I wanted. But whether what you say
is true or not I cannot as yet tell, although I make no doubt
that you will prove the truth of your words.
[Sidenote: _The quarrels of the gods._]
_Euth._ Of course.
_Soc._ Come, then, and let us examine what we are saying.
That thing or person which is dear to the gods is pious, and
that thing or person which is hateful to the gods is impious,
these two being the extreme opposites of one another. Was
not that said?
_Euth._ It was.
_Soc._ And well said?
_Euth._ Yes, Socrates, I thought so; it was certainly said.
_Soc._ And further, Euthyphro, the gods were admitted to
have enmities and hatreds and differences?
_Euth._ Yes, that was also said.
[Sidenote: Differences about numbers and figures create no ill-will
because they can be settled by a sum or by a weighing machine, but
enmities about the just and unjust are the occasions of quarrels, both
among gods and men.]
_Soc._ And what sort of difference creates enmity and anger?
Suppose, for example, that you and I, my good friend, differ
about a number; do differences of this sort make us enemies
and set us at variance with one another? Do we not go at
once to arithmetic, and put an end to them by a sum?
_Euth._ True.
_Soc._ Or suppose that we differ about magnitudes, do we
not quickly end the difference by measuring?
_Euth._ Very true.
_Soc._ And we end a controversy about heavy and light by
resorting to a weighing machine?
_Euth._ To be sure.