The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements — Plato — John Shaqi
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Plato · en
6. [38]“Pythagoras and Plato command us to fly from the multitude,
that we may pursue the most simple truth, and apply ourselves wholly
to the contemplation of real being. From the multitude of exterior
people drawing us aside in various ways, and deceiving us by fallacious
appearances. But much more to shun the multitude of interior people;
for this much more distracts and deceives. We must, therefore, fly from
the various multitude of affections, the obscure informations of sense,
the shadowy objects of imagination, and the dusky light of opinion. For
every multitude of this kind is so different in itself, that its parts
are contrary to one another; from whence it is necessary to betake
ourselves to the sciences, in which multitude has no contrariety.
For though affections are contrary to affections, one perception
of sense to another, imaginations to imaginations, and opinions to
opinions, yet no one science is found contrary to another. In this
multitude, therefore, of propositions and notions, we may collect
into one the number of sciences binding them in one according bond.
For they are so remote from contrariety to each other, that notion is
subservient to notion, and inferior sciences minister to superior,
depending on them for their origin. Above all, it is here necessary,
from many sciences which pre-suppose one, to betake ourselves to one
science itself, no longer supposing another, and in an orderly series
to refer them all to this original one. But after science, and its
study, it will be necessary to lay aside compositions, divisions, and
multiform discourses, and from thence to ascend to intellectual life,
to its simple vision, and intimate perception. For science is not the
summit of knowledge, but beyond it is intellect; not that intellect
only which is separated from soul, but the illustration infused from
thence into the soul, which Aristotle affirms to be the intellect by
which we acknowledge the principles of science; and Timæus says, that
this exists in no place but the soul. Ascending, therefore, to this
intellect, we must contemplate together with it intelligible essence,
by indivisible and simple perceptions, speculating the simple genera
of beings. But after venerable intellect itself, it will be proper to
contemplate that summit of the soul, by which we are one, and under
whose influence our multitude is united. For as by our intellect
we touch the divine intellect; so by our unity, and as it were the
_flower_ of our essence, it will be lawful to touch that first
one, from whom all subordinate unities proceed. And by this our
_one_, we are especially conjoined with divinity. For similitude
may be every where comprehended by that which is similar; the objects
of knowledge by science; things intelligible by intellect; and the most
unifying measures of being, by the unity of the soul. But this unity
and its energy is the summit of our actions; for by this we become