The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
Nevertheless, because forms are first separated in it, and because
it is all-perfect, it subsists in the third order of intelligibles.
For neither that which is primarily, nor that which is secondarily
being,[188] is all-perfect. For the former is beyond all separation;
but the latter generates indeed, and is parturient with intelligibles,
but is not yet the multitude of beings. If therefore neither of these
is multitude, how can either of them be all-perfect multitude? If
however all-perfect multitude shines forth in the third triad of
intelligibles, as was a little before demonstrated, but animal itself
is the first paradigm (for it is comprehensive of all intelligible
animals, is an only-begotten paradigm, and is not conjoined with
any other principle) it is necessary that animal itself should be
established according to this order. For either there will not be an
intelligible paradigm, (and in this case, how will sensibles be images
of intelligibles? or how will the intelligible Gods be the fathers of
the whole of things?) or if there is, it is the third in intelligibles.
For the natures which are prior to the triad in intelligibles, are not
all-perfect; since they are exempt from the division into multitude.
But the natures posterior to it are not only-begotten. For they proceed
together with others; the male indeed, with the female, and those
that are of a demiurgic together with those that are of a generative
characteristic. Nor are they the most beautiful of intelligibles; for
beauty is in the intelligible. But animal itself is all-perfect, and at
the same time only begotten. The first paradigm of beings therefore,
is arranged in the third triad of intelligibles. Moreover, animal
itself is eternal, as Timæus himself says. For says he, “the nature of
animal is eternal.” And again, in another place he asserts, “that the
paradigm is through all eternity being.” If therefore it is eternal, it
participates of eternity. And if that which participates is every where
secondary to that which is participated, animal itself is secondary to
eternity. And if it is through all eternity being, it is filled with
the whole power of eternity. If this however be the case, it subsists
proximately after eternity. For that which enjoys the whole of causes,
is arranged proximately after them.
CHAPTER XVI.