The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
What therefore is the heaven to which Jupiter leads the Gods? For
if we should say that it is the sensible heaven, as certain other
persons say it is, it will be necessary that the more excellent genera
should be converted to things naturally subordinate to themselves.
For if Jupiter the mighty leader in the heaven proceeds to this
sensible heaven, and leads to it all the Gods that follow him, he will
have a conversion to things subordinate, and posterior to himself.
And together with Jupiter, this will also be the case with all the
leaders, and the Gods and dæmons suspended from these; though the same
Socrates in the Phædrus says, that even a partial soul when perfected
is conversant with sublime concerns, and governs the whole world.
How is it possible therefore, that the leaders of whole souls should
be converted to the sensible heaven, and exchange the intelligible
place of survey for an inferior allotment, when through these souls
they preside over the universe, in order that they may illuminate
mundane natures with a liberated and unrestrained power? In addition
to these things also, what are the blessed intellections of the Gods
within this sensible heaven, and what are the evolutions of all the
knowledge of sensibles?[213] For in short the Gods know sensibles,
not by a conversion to them, but by containing in themselves the
causes of them. Hence intellectually perceiving themselves, they know
sensibles causally, and rule over them, not by looking to them, and
verging to the subjects of their government, but by converting through
love inferior natures to themselves. Neither therefore, is it lawful
for the Gods who adorn the whole of heaven, and think it worthy their
providential care, to be ever situated under the circulation of this
heaven; nor is there any blessedness in the contemplation of the things
which exist under it; nor are the souls that are converted to this
contemplation among the number of those that are happy, and that fellow
the Gods, but they rank among those that exchange intelligible for
doxastic nutriment, such as Socrates says, the souls are that are lame,
that have broken their wings, and are in a merged condition. Since
therefore passions of this kind belong to partial souls, and these not
such as are happy, how can we refer a conversion to the sensible heaven
to the ruling and leading Gods?