The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
But if it be necessary to survey in one Platonic dialogue, the
all-perfect, whole, and connected, extending as far as to the compleat
number of theology, I shall perhaps assert a paradox, and which
will alone be apparent to our familiars. We ought however to dare,
since we have entered on such like arguments, and affirm against our
opponents, that the Parmenides, and the mystic conceptions it contains,
will accomplish all you desire. For in this dialogue all the divine
genera proceed in order from the first cause, and evince their mutual
connexion and dependence on each other. And those which are highest
indeed, connate with _the one_, and of a primary nature, are
allotted a unical, occult and simple form of hyparxis; but such as
are last, are multiplied, are distributed into many parts, and are
exuberant in number, but inferior in power to such as are of a higher
order; and such as are middle, according to a convenient proportion,
are more composite than their causes, but more simple than their
proper progeny. And in short, all the axioms of the theologic science,
appear in perfection in this dialogue, and all the divine orders are
exhibited subsisting in connexion. So that this is nothing else than
the celebrated generation of the Gods, and the procession of every
kind of being from the ineffable and unknown cause of wholes. The
Parmenides, therefore, enkindles in the lovers of Plato, the whole and
perfect light of the theological science. But after this, the before
mentioned dialogues distribute parts of the mystic discipline about the
Gods, and all of them, as I may say, participate of divine wisdom, and
excite our spontaneous conceptions respecting a divine nature. And it
is necessary to refer all the parts of this mystic discipline to these
dialogues, and these again to the one and all-perfect theory of the
Parmenides. For thus, as it appears to me, we shall suspend the more
imperfect from the perfect, and parts from wholes, and shall exhibit
reasons assimilated to things, of which, according to the Platonic
Timæus, they are interpreters. Such then is our answer to the objection
which may be urged against us; and thus we refer the Platonic theory to
the Parmenides; just as the Timæus is acknowledged by all who are in
the least degree intelligent, to contain the whole science about nature.
CHAPTER VIII.