The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
For if the first God is _the one_ and _the good_, and so far as he is
_the one_, he is also _the good_, and so far as _the good, the one_, if
this be the case, every series of the Gods has the form of _the one_,
and the form of _the good_, according to one peculiarity, and each of
the Gods is not a unity and goodness according to any thing else. But
each so far as he is a unity, so far he is a goodness, and so far as he
is a goodness, so far he is a unity. So far also as the Gods posterior
to the first God proceed from the first, they have the form of _the
good_, and the form of _the one_, since the first is _the one_ and
_the good_. But so far as all of them are Gods, they are unities and
goodnesses. As, therefore, _the one_ of the Gods is superessential, so
likewise is their goodness, since it is nothing else than _the one_.
For each of them is not any thing else than _the good_, but is good
alone; as neither is each any thing else than _the one_, but is one
alone.
PROPOSITION CXX.
Every God possesses in his own hyparxis a providential inspection of
the whole of things. And a providential energy is primarily in the Gods.
* * * * *
For all other things which are posterior to the Gods, energize
providentially through the participation of them. But providence
is connascent with the Gods. For if to impart good to the subjects
of providential energy, is the prerogative of the providential
peculiarity, but all the Gods are goodnesses, either they do not impart
themselves to anything, and thus nothing will be good in secondary
natures. And whence will that be derived which subsists according
to participation, except from those natures that primarily possess
peculiarities? Or if they do impart themselves, they impart good, and
in consequence of this providentially attend to all things. Providence,
therefore, subsists primarily in the Gods. For where is the energy
which is prior to intellect, except in superessential natures? But
providence (προνοια), as the name signifies, is an energy prior to
intellect (ενεργεια εστι προ νου). The Gods, therefore, from being
Gods, and from being goodnesses, provide for all things, and fill all
things with the goodness which is prior to intellect.
PROPOSITION CXXI.
Every divine nature has indeed for its hyparxis goodness, but possesses
a power which is unsubdued and at once incomprehensible by all
secondary natures.
* * * * *
For if it providentially attends to the whole of things, there is in
it a power which has dominion over the subjects of its providential
energy; through which being unsubdued and uncircumscribed by all
things, divine natures fill all things with, and subject all things to
themselves. For every thing of a ruling nature, which is the cause of
other things, and has dominion over them, rules through abundance of
power, and predominates according to nature.