The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
“The scope of this speech (says Proclus) is to insert demiurgic power
and providence in the mundane genera of Gods, to lead them forth to
the generation of the remaining kinds of animals, and to place them
over mortals, analogously to the father of wholes over the one orderly
distribution of the universe. For it is necessary that some things
should be primarily generated by the demiurgic monad, and others
through other media; the Demiurgus, indeed, producing all things from
himself, at once and eternally, but the things produced in order, and
first proceeding from him, producing together with him the natures
posterior to themselves. Thus, for instance, the celestial produce
sublunary Gods, and these generate mortal animals; the Demiurgus at
the same time fabricating these in conjunction with the celestial and
sublunary divinities. For in speaking he understands all things, and by
understanding all things he also makes the mortal genera of animals;
these requiring another proximate generating cause, so far as they
are mortal, and through this receiving a progression into being. But
the character of the words is enthusiastic, shining with intellectual
intuitions, pure and venerable as being perfected by the father of the
Gods, differing from and transcending human conceptions, delicate and
at the same time terrific, full of grace and beauty--at once concise
and perfectly accurate. Plato, therefore, particularly studies these
things in the imitations of divine speeches; as he also evinces in the
Republic, when he represents the Muses speaking sublimely, and the
prophet ascending to a lofty seat. He also adorns both these speeches
with conciseness and venerableness, employing the accurate powers of
colons, directly shadowing forth divine intellections through such a
form of words. But in the words before us he omits no transcendency
either of the grand and robust in the sentences and the names
adapted to these devices, or of magnitude in the conceptions and the
figures which give completion to this idea. Besides this, also, much
distinction and purity, the unfolding of truth, and the illustrious
prerogatives of beauty, are mingled with the idea of magnitude, this
being especially adapted to the subject things, to the speaker, and to
the hearers. For the objects of this speech are, the perfection of the
universe, an assimilation to all-perfect animal [i.e. to its paradigm],
and the generation of all mortal animals; the maker of all things, at
the same time, presubsisting and adorning all things through exempt
transcendency; but the secondary fabricators adding what was wanting
to the formation of the universe. All, therefore, being great and
divine, as well the persons as the things, and shining with beauty and
a distinction from each other, Plato has employed words adapted to the
form of the speech.