A bacteriological study of ham souringMcBryde, Charles Neil
Science
A bacteriological study of ham souring
McBryde, Charles Neil
Ham -- Microbiology
_Tierce No. 1._—Contained 20 hams, each ham being injected
with 20 cubic centimeters of the suspension or the equivalent
of 10 cubic centimeters of the original culture. The hams were
injected while on the hanging floor, before they had been cut
from the carcasses and previous to chilling. The carcasses were
still quite warm—that is, had lost but little of their body
heat when the injections were made. The carcasses, which had
been carefully tagged, were then run into coolers and given the
usual 48-hour chill, after which the hams were severed from the
carcasses and given an additional 48-hour chill in accordance
with the custom of the packing house at which the experiment
was carried out. The hams were next pumped with regular pumping
pickle, 10 being pumped in both body and shank and 10 in shank
only. They were finally packed in a tierce, which was then
headed up, filled with regular curing pickle, and placed in
cure.
Result: When tested at the end of the cure it was found that
the 10 hams which were pumped in the shank only were all sour.
In each of them the souring extended throughout the entire ham,
in the shank as well as in the body, and was very pronounced,
so much so that they were characterized as “stinkers” by the
meat inspector who assisted in testing them. The bone marrow
of the femur or middle bone was sour in all of these hams. Of
the 10 hams which were pumped in both body and shank 7 showed
well-marked souring throughout the body, but the souring did
not extend into the shank. The bone marrow of the femur was
found to be sour in 6 of these hams, while in 1 the souring had
not extended through to the bone marrow.
_Tierce No. 2._—Contained 20 hams which were chilled and pumped
in exactly the same manner as those in tierce No. 1. These hams
were injected with culture after they had been chilled and
pumped, or just before they were placed in cure. The hams in
this tierce, therefore, were injected with culture four days
later than those in tierce 1. The hams were injected with a
bacterial suspension prepared in the same manner as that used
for tierce 1, except that the egg-pork cultures from which
the suspension was prepared were 7 days instead of 10 days
old. Each ham was injected with 20 cubic centimeters of the
suspension or the equivalent of 10 cubic centimeters of the
original culture. The hams were injected in the same manner as
those in tierce 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account