A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
A comparison with Spinoza’s conception of the world of nature brings
out Leibnitz’s meaning effectively. Both philosophers conceive nature
phenomena to be under the law of mechanical causation. To Spinoza,
however, all phenomena are qualitatively alike; there are no grades or
distinctions of value between them. All are modes of substance and all
illusions in the sight of God. To Spinoza phenomena are homogeneous.
Leibnitz’s estimate of the world of nature is quite different, and for
him nature has a far richer endowment. The phenomena of nature are not
homogeneous. Their difference does not consist in their content, but
in the degree in which they represent the universe. The law of nature
is a unifying principle that gives unitary individuality to the members
under the law. The individuality of the terms of the nature-series
is implied in the very nature of the law of necessity, and on the
other hand, the individual terms, for their part, transform the law of
necessity into a principle of unity that is higher than bare necessity.
In a necessitated series, Leibnitz points out, each term is determined
by the preceding, and in turn each term determines the events that
follow. Thus, while nature phenomena are a series and a necessitated
series, it is a series whose existence depends upon each event having
not only its place, but its unique place. No other event can fill that
place, and the conditions that give the event its place constitute its
individuality. Every finite event has, so to speak, its formula, and
this gives individuality to each term of the series, which appeared
to Spinoza only as a homogeneous, mathematical, and characterless
mode. Life is meaningful to Leibnitz, because each member of the
necessitated series of events has its unique part to play. The changes
of life are to Spinoza void of meaning, because he conceives them
to be undifferentiated. The law of mechanical necessity became under
Leibnitz’s hands a principle of harmony, a teleological principle. Even
in the necessitated mathematical series, such as Spinoza conceived the
world to be, Leibnitz believed that necessity implies individuality and
individuality implies purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account