A Bill of Divorcement: A Play in Three ActsDane, Clemence
General
A Bill of Divorcement: A Play in Three Acts
Dane, Clemence
England -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Drama; Families -- Drama; Man-woman relationships -- Drama; Mental illness -- Drama
HILARY. There is no situation. I married Meg. I fell ill. Now I’m well
again. I want my wife.
DR. ALLIOT. Why, yes--yes--
HILARY. [_Picking it up irritably_] “Yes--yes--” “Yes--yes--” I suppose
that’s what you call humouring a lunatic.
DR. ALLIOT. Why, I hope to be convinced, Fairfield, that that trouble’s
over, but--
HILARY. But you’re going to lock me up again because I want my wife.
DR. ALLIOT. [_Patiently_] Will you let me put the case to you?
HILARY. You can put fifty cases. It makes no difference.
SYDNEY. [_At his elbow, softly_] Father, I’d listen.
HILARY. [_Slipping his arm through hers_] Eh? Sydney? that you? You’re
not against me, Sydney?
SYDNEY. Nobody’s against you. We only want you to listen.
HILARY. Well, out with it!
DR. ALLIOT. D’you remember--can you throw your mind back to the
beginning of the agitation against the marriage laws? No, you were a
schoolboy--
HILARY. Deceased wife’s sister, eh? That’s the law that lets a man marry
his sister-in-law and won’t let a woman marry her brother-in-law. Pretty
good, that, for your side of the counter.
DR. ALLIOT. Well, well, that hardly matters now.
HILARY. It shows what your rotten, muddle-headed laws are worth, anyhow.
SYDNEY. Father.
HILARY. All right! Go ahead! Go ahead!
DR. ALLIOT. Well, as the result of that agitation--and remember, Hilary,
what thousand, thousand tragedies must have had voice in such an
outcry--a commission was appointed to enquire into the working of the
divorce laws. It made its report, recommended certain drastic reforms,
and there, I suppose, as is the way with commissions, would have been
the end of the subject, if it hadn’t been for the war--and the war
marriages.
HILARY. [_Lowering_] So that’s where I come in! Margaret, is that where
I come in?
DR. ALLIOT. Never, I suppose, in one decade were there so many young
marriages. Happy? that’s another thing! Marry in haste--
MARGARET. They weren’t all happy.
DR. ALLIOT. But they were _young_, those boys and girls who married. As
young as Kit, and as impatient as Sydney. And that saved them. That
young, young generation found out, out of their own unhappiness, the war
taught them, what peace couldn’t teach us--that when conditions are evil
it is not your duty to submit--that when conditions are evil, your duty,
in spite of protests, in spite of sentiment, your duty, though you
trample on the bodies of your nearest and dearest to do it, though you
bleed your own heart white, your duty is to see that those conditions
are changed. If your laws forbid you, you must change your laws. If your
church forbids you, you must change your church; and if your God forbids
you, why then, you must change your God.
MISS FAIRFIELD. And we who will not change?
MARGARET. Or cannot change--?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account