Passing by the Abu Roash pyramid of King Razedef, we begin our survey
with the magnificent group of Gizeh, which to the ordinary man are the
Pyramids to the exclusion of all others. Everyone knows, of course,
what the Pyramids are like, and has some rough idea of their surpassing
size, and perhaps the only way to impress the sense of their vastness
on the mind is to use one or other of the comparisons which have
been worked out to illustrate the stupendous scale on which they are
built. To tell the reader that the weight of the stones built into the
Great Pyramid is over six million tons is merely to bewilder him; the
vastness of the business may be better appreciated when one realises
that a town of the size of Aberdeen might be built out of the materials
which Khufu gathered together for his monstrous tomb, or that if the
stones were divided into blocks a foot square, and these blocks placed
end to end in a straight line, the line would be long enough to reach
two-thirds of the length of the circumference of the earth at the
Equator.
[Illustration: 6. GREAT PYRAMID AND SPHINX, WITH PART OF TEMPLE OF THE
SPHINX.]
Khufu’s pyramid was originally about 481 feet in height, and each of
its sides measured at the base a matter of 755 feet 8 inches, and these
long lines were laid out and built with such wonderful accuracy that
the maximum error is not more than an inch. “The laying out of the base
of the Great Pyramid of Khufu,” says Professor Sir W. M. F. Petrie, “is
a triumph of skill; its errors, both in length and in angles, could be
covered by placing one’s thumb on them; and to lay out a square of more
than a furlong in the side (and with rock in the midst of it, which
prevented any diagonal checks being measured) with such accuracy shows
surprising care. The work of the casing stones which remain is of the
same class; the faces are so straight and so truly square, that when
the stones were built together the film of mortar left between them is
on an average not thicker than one’s thumb-nail, though the joint is a
couple of yards long; and the levelling of them over long distances has
not any larger errors.” “Equal to optician’s work of the present day,”
says the same authority elsewhere, “but on a scale of acres instead of
feet or yards of material.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account