A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
It may be mentioned that for a number of years the decision in regard to
the atomic weights to be accepted has been in the hands of an
International Committee of which our fellow countryman F. W. Clarke has
been chairman. In connection with this position and previously, Clarke
has done valuable service in re-calculating and summarizing atomic
weight determinations.
_Analytical Chemistry._
Analysis is of such fundamental importance in nearly every other branch
of chemical investigation that its development has been of the utmost
importance in connection with the advancement of the science. It
attained, therefore, a comparatively early development, and one hundred
years ago it was in a flourishing condition, particularly as far as
inorganic qualitative and gravimetric analysis were concerned. There is
no doubt that Berzelius, whose atomic weight determinations have already
been mentioned, surpassed all other analysts of that time in the amount,
variety, and accuracy of his gravimetric work. He lived through three
decades of our period, until 1848.
During the past century there has been constant progress in inorganic
analysis, due to improved methods, better apparatus and accumulated
experience. An excellent work on this subject was published by H. Rose,
a pupil of Berzelius, and the methods of the latter, with many
improvements and additions by the author and others, were thus made
accessible. Fresenius, who was born in 1818, did much service in
establishing a laboratory in which the teaching of analytical chemistry
was made a specialty, in writing text-books on the subject and in
establishing in 1862 the “Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie,” which has
continued up to the present time.
Besides Berzelius, who was the first to show that minerals were definite
chemical compounds, there have been many prominent mineral analysts in
Europe, among whom Rammelsberg and Bunsen may be mentioned, but there
came a time towards the end of the nineteenth century when the attention
of chemists, particularly in Germany, was so much absorbed by organic
chemistry that mineral analysis came near becoming a lost art there. It
was during that period that an English mineralogist, visiting New Haven
and praising the mineral analyses that were being carried out at Yale,
expressed regret that there appeared to be no one in England, or in
Germany either, who could analyze minerals.
The best analytical work done in this country in the early part of our
period was chiefly in connection with mineral analysis, and a large
share of it was published in the Journal. Henry Seybert, of
Philadelphia, in particular, showed remarkable skill in this direction,
and published numerous analyses of silicates and other minerals,
beginning in 1822. It was he who first detected boric acid in tourmaline
(=6=, 155, 1822), and beryllium in chrysoberyl (=8=, 105, 1824). His
methods for silicate analyses were very similar to those used at the
present time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account