A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
J. Lawrence Smith in 1853 described his method for determining alkalies
in minerals (=16=, 53), a method which in its final form (=1=, 269,
1871) is the best ever devised for the purpose. He also described (=15=,
94, 1853) a very useful method, still largely used in analytical work,
for destroying ammonium salts by means of aqua regia. Carey Lea (=42=,
109, 1866) described the well-known test for iodides by means of
potassium dichromate. F. W. Clarke (=49=, 48, 1870) showed that antimony
and arsenic could be quantitatively separated from tin by the
precipitation of the sulphides in the presence of oxalic acid. In 1864
Wolcott Gibbs (=37=, 346) began an important series of analytical notes
from the Lawrence Scientific School, and he worked out later many
difficult analytical problems, particularly in connection with his
extensive researches upon the complex inorganic acids.
From 1850 on, Brush and his students made many important investigations
upon minerals, and from 1877 Penfield (=13=, 425), beginning with an
analysis of a new mineral from Branchville, Connecticut, described by
Brush and E. S. Dana, displayed remarkable skill and industry in this
kind of work. Both of the writers of this article were fortunate in
being associated with Penfield in some of his researches upon minerals
and one of us began as he did with the Branchville work. It is probably
fair to say that Penfield did the most accurate work in mineral analysis
that has ever been accomplished, and that he was similarly successful in
crystallography and other physical branches of mineralogy.
The American analytical investigations that have been mentioned were all
published in the Journal, with the exception of a part of Gibbs’s work.
Many other American workers at mineral analysis might be alluded to
here, but only the excellent work of a number of chemists in the United
States Geological Survey will be mentioned. Among these Hillebrand
deserves particular praise for the extent of his investigations and for
his careful researches in improving the methods of rock analysis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account