A Character of King Charles the Second: And Political, Moral and Miscellaneous Thoughts and ReflectionsHalifax, George Savile, Marquis of
History
A Character of King Charles the Second: And Political, Moral and Miscellaneous Thoughts and Reflections
Halifax, George Savile, Marquis of
Charles II, King of England, 1630-1685 -- Early works to 1800
It is a Diminution instead of a Glory, to be above treating upon equal
Terms with Reason.
If the People were designed to be the sole Property of the supream
Magistrate, sure God would have made them of a differing and subordinate
Species; as he hath the Beasts, that by the Inferiority of their Nature
they might the better submit to the Dominion of Mankind.
If none were to have Liberty but those who understand what it is, there
would not be many freed Men in the World.
When the People contend for their Liberty, they seldom get any thing by
their Victory but new Masters.
Liberty can neither be got, nor kept, but by so much Care, that Mankind
generally are unwilling to give the Price for it. And therefore, in the
Contest between Ease and Liberty, the first hath generally prevailed.
_Of_ LAWS.
Laws are generally not understood by three Sorts of Persons, _viz._ by
those that make them, by those that execute them, and by those that
suffer, if they break them.
Men seldom understand any Laws but those they _feel_.
Precepts, like Fomentations, must be rubbed into us; and with a rough Hand
too.
If the Laws could speak for themselves, they would complain of the Lawyers
in the first Place.
There is more Learning now required to explain a Law made, than went to
the making it.
The Law hath so many Contradictions, and Varyings from itself, that the
Law may not improperly be called a Law-breaker.
It is become too changeable a thing to be defined: it is made little less
a _Mystery_ than the _Gospel_.
The Clergy and the Lawyers, like the Free-Masons, may be supposed to take
an Oath not to tell the Secret.
The Men of Law have a Biass to their calling in the Interpretations they
make of the Law.
_Of_ PARLIAMENTS.
The Parliaments are so altered from their original Constitution, that
between the Court and the Country, the House, instead of being united, is
like Troops of a contrary Party facing one another, and watching their
Advantage.
Even the well-meaning Men who have good Sense too, have their Difficulties
in an Assembly; what they offer honestly for a good End, will be skilfully
improved for an ill one.
It is strange that a gross Mistake should live a Minute in an Assembly;
one would expect that it should be immediately stifled by their discerning
Faculties. But Practice convinceth that a Mistake is no where better
entertained.
In Parliaments, Men wrangle in behalf of Liberty, that do as little care
for it, as they deserve it.
Where the People in Parliament give a good deal of Money in exchange for
any thing from the Crown, a wise Prince can hardly have an ill bargain.
The present Gift begetteth more; it is a Politick kind of Generation; and
whenever a Parliament does not bring forth, it is the Unskilfulness of the
Government, that is the cause of the Miscarriage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account