A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
The fact that judging and thinking so closely resemble each
other has given just cause for some logicians to designate
judging as the most fundamental element in all thinking. “The
simplest form of thinking,” says Creighton, “is judging.” In
order to think many notions into one class it is necessary to
conjoin notions. To illustrate: The child who has a general
notion of man sees for the first time a negro. If he recognizes
the negro as a colored man he must conjoin his general notion of
man with this individual notion. In short, a concept is built by
means of a series of judgments. It may be said further that an
inference is simply a _made-over judgment_. It is thus evident
that judging appears in both the thought processes of conception
and inference and, therefore, as a final conclusion it may be
affirmed that judging, though perhaps not the simplest form of
thinking, is the basic element of _developed_ thought.
=11. INFERENCE AS A THOUGHT PRODUCT.=
Reasoning is the process of deriving a new judgment from a
consideration of other judgments. The product of any reasoning
process may be called an inference, although, as will appear in
a later chapter, inference is commonly used as indicating the
process as well as the product.
Often reasoning may assume a syllogistic form with the inference
as its conclusion. A syllogism is an arrangement of three
propositions using three different terms. The following are
syllogisms:
(1) All children should play.
Mary is a child.
Hence, Mary should play.
(2) No teacher should judge hastily.
You are a teacher.
Hence, you should not judge hastily.
In the second syllogism the inference, “you should not judge
hastily,” is derived from the other two judgments by merely
eliminating the common term teacher and disjoining the remaining
two terms. The inference is consequently a _new_ judgment.
Therefore, reasoning is only a matter of judging carried to a
more complex stage.
To summarize――_conception_ is largely a matter of conjoining
a general notion with an individual notion, _judging_ of
conjoining and disjoining all kinds of notions and _inference_
of conjoining and disjoining judgments. All three processes
go to form the larger process of thinking. _The concept, the
judgment and the inference are products arising from conjoining
and disjoining notions._
=12. THINKING AND APPREHENSION.=
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account