That the enumeration must be in terms of its distinguishing or characteristic attributes is implied in the derivation of the term _definition_. The attributes must establish limits or bounds, just as a line fence limits a land owner’s possessions. To indicate that man is a creature possessing the power of locomotion, sense of sight and ability to eat, is surely not a definition, as the marks are not characteristic of men only. These attributes set no boundary between man and horse, consequently the statement is a faulty _description_ of man, not a _definition_. But when the enumeration includes such attributes as power of speech, rationality and ability to laugh, then does the description become a definition. To put it differently: A definition is a description of a term by means of its distinguishing attributes. This statement may be considered a definition of man, though somewhat faulty: “A man is a creature who is rational and who possesses the power of speech and ability to laugh.” =4. DEFINITION AND DIVISION COMPARED.= We have learned that general terms when connotative may be used extensionally or intensionally. A definition indicates the _intensional_ nature of a term, while a statement which points out the _extensional_ nature of a term is known as logical division. More briefly: A definition is an _intensional_ statement of the nature of the term, while logical division is an _extensional_ statement of the nature of the term. To illustrate: The following statements are definitions: (1) A dog is a domesticated quadruped of the genus canis and given to barking. (2) A quadrilateral is a rectilinear figure of four sides. (3) Soil is a substance composed of pulverized rock and decayed vegetable matter in which plants will grow. The following represent Logical Division: (1) Dogs are divided into hounds, terriers, bull, etc. (2) The kinds of quadrilaterals are trapeziums, trapezoids and parallelograms. (3) The various soils are loam, sand, clay, muck, etc. =5. THE KINDS OF DEFINITIONS.= Generally speaking there are three kinds of definitions, namely, (1) Etymological, (2) Descriptive, (3) Logical.[5] (1) _An etymological definition is one based upon the derivation of the term._ This kind of a definition, which gives merely the meaning of the symbol, is sometimes called a _nominal_ or verbal definition; while a _real_ definition is regarded as one which gives the _meaning of the notion_ for which the symbol stands. The modern logician is inclined to ignore this classification on the argument that to make a distinction between a symbol and the notion it symbolizes is simply to misunderstand the relation which exists between them. If the definition does not agree with the thing then it cannot correctly explain the term which represents the thing. Define correctly the term and one has defined correctly the notion signified by the term.