A defence of modern spiritualismWallace, Alfred Russel
Religion
A defence of modern spiritualism
Wallace, Alfred Russel
Spiritualism
“I have seen a mahogany table, having a centre leg, and with a lamp
burning upon it, lifted from the floor at least a foot, in spite of
the efforts of those present, and shaken backward and forward as one
would shake a goblet in his hand, and the lamp retain its place,
though its glass pendants rang again.
“I have known a mahogany chair thrown on its side and moved swiftly
back and forth on the floor, no one touching it, through a room where
there were at least a dozen people sitting, yet no one was touched;
and it was repeatedly stopped within a few inches of me, when it was
coming with a violence which, if not arrested, must have broken my
legs.”
Having satisfied himself of the reality of the physical phenomena, he
came to the question of whence comes the intelligence that was so
remarkably connected with them. He says:
“Preparatory to meeting a circle, I have sat down alone in my room,
and carefully prepared a series of questions to be propounded, and I
have been surprised to find my questions answered, and in the precise
order in which I wrote them, without my even taking my memorandum out
of my pocket, and when not a person present knew that I had prepared
questions, much less what they were. My most secret thoughts, those
which I have never uttered to mortal man or woman, have been freely
spoken to as if I had uttered them; and I have been admonished that my
every thought was known to, and could be disclosed by, the
intelligence which was thus manifesting itself.
“Still the question occurred, ‘May not all this have been, by some
mysterious operation, the mere reflex of the mind of some one
present?’ The answer was, that facts were communicated which were
unknown then, but afterwards found to be true; like this, for
instance: when I was absent last winter in Central America, my friends
in town heard of my whereabouts and of the state of my health several
times; and on my return, by comparing their information with the
entries in my journal, it was found to be invariably correct. So
thoughts have been uttered on subjects not then in my mind and utterly
at variance with my own notions. This has often happened to me and to
others, so as fully to establish the fact that it was not our minds
that gave forth or affected the communication.”
These few extracts sufficiently show that the writer was aware of the
possible sources of error in such an inquiry; and the details given in
the letters prove that he was constantly on his guard against them. He
himself and his daughter became mediums; so that he afterwards obtained
personal confirmation of many of the phenomena by himself alone. But all
the phenomena referred to in the letters and “Appeal” occurred to him in
the presence of others, who testified to them as well, and thus removed
the possibility that the phenomena were subjective.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account