A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
Although Josephus in his “Antiquities” has generally reckoned the 70
years of the Captivity from the Destruction of the Temple to the 1st
year of Cyrus, which is contrary to the true chronology and to the Canon
of Ptolemy, yet we have evidence in his “Jewish War” that he was
perfectly acquainted with the correct period of 52 years, which we have
shown in our _first Part_, at pp. 80, 81, to be the true interval. Thus,
in Book vi. 4, 8, of the latter work, when speaking of the Destruction
of the Temple, he says, “and from the _first_ foundation which King
Solomon laid, till the present destruction, which happened in the 2d
year of the Emperor Vespasian, are reckoned 1130 years 7 months and 15
days; but from the _second_, which Haggai effected in the 2d year of
Cyrus the king, till the destruction under Vespasian, 639 years and 45
days.”[116] Not to dwell on the glaring anachronism of referring the
_foundation_ of the temple in the 2nd year of Cyrus (Ezra iii. 8), to
the _renewal_ of the work of building it in the 2nd year of Darius (Ezra
iv. 24, and v. 1), it is plain that the difference between the two
periods mentioned in this passage, viz. 491½ years, is the true interval
from the destruction of Solomon’s temple to the foundation of the second
Temple in the 2nd year of Cyrus; for omitting the half-year, as the 2nd
year had just commenced at the latter epoch (Ezra iii. 8), and
subtracting the 52 years above mentioned, from 491 years, we have the
remainder 439 years, for the true Extent of the _Fifth age_ as before.
The proof, however, that he was acquainted with the true interval, at
least within a year or two, is manifest from a passage which occurs in
his 1st Book _against Apion_, sect. 21; where he says, “For it is
written in them [the Hebrew Scriptures] that Nebuchadnezzar destroyed
our temple in the 18th year [the 19th year, 2 Kings xxv. 8] of his
reign, and it was in ruins for 50 years; but in the 2nd year of the
reign of Cyrus, the foundations were laid, and in the 2nd again of the
reign of Darius they were finished.”[117] The difference of 2 years is
easily accounted for by supposing that he took the reign of Cyrus in
Babylon at 9 years, according to some copies of the Canon of Ptolemy,
instead of 7 years, according to Scripture, that is, by supposing his
reign to have begun 2 years earlier than the true period. He appears,
however, to have tacked these two years to the true interval in
question, in another chapter of the same book, viz. “Jewish War,” vi.
10; where, speaking of the destruction of Jerusalem, he says “David,
King of the Jews, having expelled the people of the Canaanites, made his
own inhabit it; and 477 years 6 months afterwards, it was destroyed by
the Babylonians.”[118] Now as David reigned 33 years in Jerusalem, and
the temple was founded in the 4th year of Solomon, if we subtract 36
years from the preceding number, we obtain 441½ years for the period
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account