A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
from the foundation of the temple to its destruction, which is only 2½
years more than the true period, a surplus which appears to have arisen
from his unwarrantable addition to the true period of the 10th Book of
the Antiquities. The last passage which we shall adduce from this
extraordinary historical production, so full of chronological errors, is
from the 20th Book, where speaking of the High Priests, he says,
Nebuchadnezzar “took Josedek the High Priest captive; and the time of
their hierarchy was 466 years, 6 months, and 10 days, during the reigns
of the Jewish kings.” Now Josedek was taken captive, not when the temple
and city were burned, as Josephus erroneously says in the context, but
when the “king of Babylon took Jehoiachin in _the 8th year of his
reign_,” and “carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all
the mighty men of valour, 10,000 captives, and all the craftsmen, and
all the smiths; none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of
the land;” 2 Kings xxiv. 11–16, and 1 Chronicles vi. 15. But as
Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem _in the 19th year of his reign_ (2
Kings xxv. 8), the difference of time between the _first_, or
Jehoiachin’s captivity, and the _second_, or Zedekiah’s captivity, is
evidently 11 years, which being added to the preceding period, makes a
total of 477½ years as before. In these two passages, therefore,
Josephus is consistent with himself, and he differs from the true
chronology in this period only by the small interval of about 2 years; a
difference which, as we before remarked, may be due to his mistake in
reference to the Scriptural commencement of the reign of Cyrus, King of
Babylon. For a more extensive inquiry into this period of the Chronology
of Josephus, we refer to Mr. Cuninghame’s “Fulness of the Times,” pp.
27–60, to which we have been indebted for some suggestions in the
preceding discussion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account