A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
It has been objected to the accuracy of the chronology of the
Septuagint, that some copies of that version, were found at an early
period of the Christian era, having 167 instead of 187 years for the
_Antepaidogonian_ age of Methuselah, and 802 instead of 782 years for
his _Postpaidogonian_ age, whereby this Patriarch was represented as
surviving the flood by _fourteen_ years! Common sense, however, teaches
that this discrepancy must have been purely owing to a mistake in the
transcribers of these copies; because, other copies were extant at the
same period which contained the correct numbers. Mr. Clinton, in his
“Fasti Hellenici,” vol. i. p. 286, proves by extracts from the early
chronographers and historians, that some, as Theophilus, Eusebius,
Augustine, and Syncellus, had the faulty reading in their copies; while
others, as Demetrius, Josephus, Africanus, Epiphanius, and the author of
the Paschal Chronicle, followed the correct copies; and he states that
although “Augustine had the faulty reading in his copies,” yet “he
judiciously applied the proper remedy, and adopted the better reading.”
This difference in the copies has even reached our own times, and is
found in the two oldest and most complete manuscripts of the Septuagint
at present known to exist, namely, the Vatican and Alexandrine codices;
the edition of the Scriptures printed from the former having the faulty
reading, and that printed from the latter having the true one. The
librarians of the British Museum have indeed, conferred an invaluable
boon on the world, by the publication of the _fac simile_ of the
Alexandrine codex; and we most anxiously hope that ere long, the Pope
will permit[5] the _fac simile_ of the Vatican codex to be published,
especially as it is already printed and ready for circulation! The
acknowledged fact that discrepancies exist between this manuscript and
the editions printed from it,[6] increases the solicitude of all the
pious and learned in this country for its immediate publication. Would
that we could purchase even a single copy!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account