A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era — John Shaqi
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
The last argument we shall adduce here in favour of the chronology of
the Septuagint, and it applies both to the Ante and Post Diluvian ages,
is derived from the deliberate opinion of Dr. Kennicott. In his valuable
posthumous work, entitled “Remarks on Select Passages of the Old
Testament,” p. 16, he says, “It has been proved from _Eusebius_, that
some Hebrew copies” of the Old Testament, “having the _larger_ numbers,
existed in the fourth century; and others, on the authority of _Jacob
Edessenus_, as late as the year 700; whilst others much later, are
mentioned in the chronicle of _Ecchellensis_. And though such
manuscripts are all perhaps now lost, yet are these testimonies
confirmed by the traditions still preserved among the _Jews_ themselves,
as to _Seth being born a hundred and thirty years after Abel’s death_!”
Moreover, it is acknowledged by biblical critics, that all the copies of
the present Hebrew text were taken from manuscripts of date later than
the ninth century; and, that the striking uniformity which all the
printed editions exhibit, is to be attributed to the fact, that they
were all copied from the same codex. Dr. Hales also gives citations from
Eusebius, from the Jewish Targums, and from other works, in which
decided reference is made to the _larger_ numbers as they anciently
existed in the Hebrew.[7] In fine, Mr. Cuninghame, in his “Dissertation
on the Apocalypse,” p. 535, fourth edition, proves, on the authority of
ancient Jewish tradition, that Adam was _two hundred and thirty years_
old when he begat Seth; consequently, by the argument _ex uno disce
omnes_, we conclude that the whole of the _Antepaidogonian_ ages are
correctly given in the Septuagint, and that the true extent of the
ANTEDILUVIAN AGE, is 2262 years.
CHAPTER II.
EXTENT OF THE SECOND AGE OF THE WORLD.
1. Discrepancies of the three texts—Unfounded hypothesis of
Usher—Agreement of Josephus with the Septuagint—Authority of this
Version in the Church—Its chronology confirmed by the most
authentic Chinese annals—Reasons why the Jews altered the Hebrew
text.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account