A guide to the history of physical educationLeonard, Fred Eugene
History
A guide to the history of physical education
Leonard, Fred Eugene
Physical education and training; Physical education and training -- History
Hugo Rothstein (1810-1865), second lieutenant in the Prussian artillery
and teacher in the artillery school at Berlin, paid a visit to Sweden in
1843, and upon his return published in _Der Staat_ (September, 1844) an
article on “Gymnastics in Sweden and Ling’s System of Gymnastics.” It
attracted favorable notice in military circles, and Minister of War von
Boyen commissioned him to revisit the country in order to become better
acquainted with the subject. Accordingly in June of 1845, now first
lieutenant and accompanied by another officer, he went to Stockholm for a
full course at the Central Institute of Gymnastics (_Kongl. Gymnastiska
Centralinstitutet_), adding three months in Copenhagen to observe the
fencing and other instruction at the Danish Royal Institute of Military
Gymnastics (_Det Kongelige Militære Gymnastiske Institut_). During his
second sojourn in the Swedish capital he saw much of Director Branting
and Head Teacher Georgii, and was also a frequent guest at the palace of
King Oscar I. In the autumn of 1846 both officers were back in Berlin.
The following year Massmann published a translation of Ling’s writings
on gymnastics,[75] and Rothstein had begun work at once on a series of
volumes on the Ling system which appeared at intervals between 1847 and
1859.[76]
A direct result of the reports by Rothstein and Techow (the infantry
lieutenant who had been his companion) was the founding in Berlin
of a “Central Institute for Gymnastic Instruction in the Army”
(_Zentralinstitut für gymnastischen Unterricht in der Armee_), with
the two officers as teachers. Lübeck’s gymnasium on Blumenstrasse was
used for the practical exercises, and the first course there was begun
October 1, 1847; but the rioting which broke out in Berlin the next
spring, following the February revolution in Paris, brought it to a
sudden close. Two years later, however, the foundations of a new building
were laid in Scharnhorststrasse, and now it was decided to train both
military and civilian teachers in a single school, rechristened “Royal
Central Institute of Gymnastics” (_Königliche Zentral-Turnanstalt_)
and opened to pupils October 1, 1851. Rothstein was made director of
instruction (_Unterrichtsdirigent_). In his own teaching he employed
the Ling apparatus and exercises, making light of Jahn’s _Turnen_,
and for anatomical and physiological reasons rejecting the parallel
bars unconditionally. This action gave rise to repeated protests from
_Turnvereine_ in Berlin and other German cities, who regarded it as
a part of the government’s reactionary policy, and led to a violent
controversy (the _Barrenstreit_) in the years 1861 and 1862. Dr. Carl
Philipp Euler (1828-1901), who became civilian teacher in 1860, had
proposed that the banished apparatus be restored. Petitions, memorials,
and opinions for and against its use multiplied, and the discussion
was widened to include the whole subject of the comparative merits
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account