In 1683 the cathedral was again wantonly damaged by a reckless mob,
instigated by the ambitious Duke of Monmouth. The Cowper MSS. gives us
the following detail of the disgraceful outrages which unhappily they
succeeded in perpetrating.
“In the middle of August, James, Duke of Monmouth, came to Chester,
greatly affecting popularity, and giving countenance to riotous
assemblies and tumultuous mobs, whose violence was such as to pelt
with stones the windows of several gentlemen’s houses in the city,
and otherwise to damage the same. They likewise furiously forced the
doors of the cathedral church and destroyed most of the painted
glass, burst open the little vestries and cupboards, wherein were the
surplices and hoods belonging to the clergy, which they rent to rags,
and carried away; they beat to pieces the baptismal font, pulled down
some monuments, attempted to demolish the organ, and committed other
enormous outrages.”
It now remains for us to give a description of this venerable religious
edifice. Although in its general external appearance, it may not present
the prepossessing attractions which appertain to some other cathedral
churches, it nevertheless has a history of peculiar interest; and in its
architectural delineations is well worthy of the study of the
ecclesiologist and the antiquary. From whatever side the cathedral is
viewed, it presents the appearance of a massive pile, and exhibits a
pleasing variety of styles in accordance with the taste of different
ages; some parts decorated with elaborate workmanship, while others are
perfectly simple and unadorned. The principal parts now standing are
not, perhaps, older than the 14th and 15th century, when the richly
ornamented style of Gothic architecture was at its zenith in this
country. Its general character may be termed the perpendicular. It has
been generally supposed that there are some remaining specimens of the
Saxon, and Lysons favours the theory; but Mr. Asphitel, in an interesting
and able lecture, delivered before the Archæological Society, stated that
he could not, from the most minute research, discover any portions of the
Saxon church. He considered it probable there might be some portions in
the foundations, but none, in his opinion, were visible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account