A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
_Nomen cum violis rosisque natum._ Wherefore Ben Jonson took it for
the heroine of this most beautiful thing, _The Sad Shepherd_.
There are two things noticeable here—first, Martial’s truly poetical
sensitiveness to the beauty of a name, for certainly there is none
prettier than Earine (let him keep the masculine to himself!) which also
appears elsewhere; and secondly his equally poetical yearning for that
licence of “common” quantification, which has made Greek and English the
two great poetical languages of the world.[342] If he would have
developed these views a little oftener, and at a little greater length,
we really could have spared a considerable number of epigrams imputing
unmentionable offences to the persons he did not like. It was his cue,
however, to profess (though half his charm comes from his sense of them)
disdain for such niceties, as in the 81st epigram of the same book,
which is one of his neatest turns. Readers, he says, and hearers like
his books, but a certain poet denies that they are correctly finished
(_exactos_). It does not trouble him much, for he would rather that the
courses of the feast he offers pleased the guests than that they pleased
the cooks. In this, light as it is, there lurks the germ of a weighty
criticism, and one which would, had it been worked out, have carried
Martial far from the ordinary critical standpoint of his time. That, in
homely phrase analogous to his own, the proof of the pudding is in the
eating—that the production of the poetical satisfaction afterwards, not
the satisfaction of the examiners beforehand as to the observation of
the rules, is the thing—that Martial doubtless saw, and that he, by
implication, says. But he does not say it quite openly, and it might
have shocked Quintilian (though it would not have shocked Longinus) if
he had.
Footnote 342:
My friend Professor Hardie rather demurs to the idea of “common”
syllables being commoner in Greek than in Latin, save possibly in
proper names. But I had certainly thought they were, and, even if we
allow for some poetic and humorous exaggeration in _nihil negatum_, it
seems to show that Martial thought so too.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account