A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The first book is devoted to the subject of the education of boys from
the earliest age, a subject on which Quintilian speaks [Sidenote: _Book
I. Elementary Education_] with much knowledge and good sense, as well as
kindliness. But from this he soon passes to Grammar, and his importance
for us begins. For his treatment of the subject is quite in the larger
and humaner sense, insisting from the first on critical reading, though
he seems, as indeed we should expect, to regard the “desperate hook” of
the extremer kind of verbal critic with little favour. It is noteworthy
that he alleges music to be necessary, because the grammarian has to
speak of metre and rhythm. And passing rapidly from considerations of
orthography, right pronunciation, and audience, he arrives at the
all-important subject of “correctness,” and of its attainment,
negatively by the avoidance of barbarisms and solecisms, positively by
the selection of the best words in the best arrangement. Observations of
special importance in this context may be cited: That the word in itself
(_i.e._, out of connection) has no merit except its inherent euphony;
that (a most pregnant remark) it is often difficult to distinguish
Faults from Figures of speech; and some exceedingly [Sidenote: _and
Grammar._] interesting, but also more than ordinarily difficult, remarks
on tone and accent-variation. In all these grammatical notes, which are
pretty full and numerous, and often very curious—showing that, as he
himself says pleasantly, though he is not writing a treatise on Grammar,
yet as it lay in his way he did not like not to be polite to it—there is
a pervading quality of not at all Philistine common-sense which shows
the best side of the Roman temperament. Although Quintilian acknowledges
the convenience of Greek for terminology, and makes fairly free use of
the terms, it is quite evident that he has (long before he formulates it
later) a profound and very wholesome distrust of the Greek rhetorical
practice of splitting a thing up, naming the splinters, and then passing
on, as if a real, solid, and final examination had been attained. And
the same quality appears eminently in the summing up of his discourse on
words, “Custom in speaking I shall call the agreement of the educated,
as custom in living is the agreement of the good.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account